跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04250272
NCT04250272Unknown不适用

Serratus Anterior Plane Block vs. Intercostal Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesic Effect After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Prospective Study

Kyungpook National University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2019年8月16日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
Postoperative pain: numeric rating scale

研究概览

简要总结

A prospective randomized controlled study was undertaken to compare the postoperative analgesic effect between ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

详细描述

Post-thoracotomy pain is one of the most notorious postsurgical pains that one can experience. The pain is known to last for an extensive period of time with significantly high intensity.

In field of thoracic surgery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has been played an important role in alleviating the postoperative pain. In field of anesthesiology, various attempts to alleviate post-thoracotomy pain have been tried along advancement of thoracic surgical techniques. It began with postoperative medication of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids and progressed into implementations such as local analgesia, thoracic epidural block, paravertebral block, intercostal nerve block, interpleural block and serratus anterior plane block.

Many analgesic methods have been applied to alleviate postoperative pain in patients who have undergone thoracoscopic surgeries. However, there are no prospective randomized controlled studies between intercostal nerve block and serratus anterior plane block in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. The main purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the effects between conventional intercostal nerve block and newly introduced serratus anterior plane block in lung cancer patients who have undergone video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

This prospective study will discover the efficacy and differences between two methods.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • lung cancer
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III class
  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

排除标准

  • previous history of allergy to local anesthetics
  • psychological disorder
  • chronic analgesics or sedatives use
  • coagulopathy
  • The presence of systemic infection or local infection at injection site
  • Pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

Postoperative pain: numeric rating scale

时间窗: 24 hours later operation

Postoperative pain will be evaluated using a numeric rating scale (0 being no pain, 10 being worst pain imaginable)

次要结局

  • Number of analgesics consumption(through study completion, an average of 1 yea)
  • Amount of analgesics consumption(: through study completion, an average of 1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Saeyoung Kim, MD, PhD

Associate professor

Kyungpook National University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验