Safely Ruling Out Deep Vein Thrombosis in Pregnancy With the LEFt Clinical Decision Rule and D-Dimer

• Conditions: Pregnancy; Deep Vein Thrombosis

• Registration Number: NCT02507180
• Lead Sponsor: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Brief Summary

This is prospective cohort study in pregnant women who present with signs and symptoms of possible deep vein thrombosis (DVT). All patients will have the same method of assessment of their DVT symptoms (the LEFt clinical decision rule will be applied and D-dimer test will be done) to determine if a compression ultrasound is required. All patients will be followed for a period of 3 months.

Detailed Description

VTE is a leading cause of maternal death in the developed world. Suspected DVT in pregnancy is a common clinical problem faced by clinicians daily. The only validated method to exclude DVT in pregnancy requires leg vein CUS imaging. This imaging modality is costly and has limited availability (only available in radiology departments and, usually, only during weekday daytime hours) often necessitating referral to the emergency room for initiation of heparin injections until leg vein CUS can be obtained. A simple and seemingly powerful clinical decision rule (LEFt) and a simple blood test (D-dimer) may be promising to exclude DVT in pregnancy without the need for diagnostic imaging. Validating the safety of a simple, non-invasive, widely available approach to suspected DVT in pregnancy would be an important advance in maternal health.

A prospective cohort diagnostic management study in pregnant women with suspected DVT, with three-month follow-up for symptomatic VTE will take place in multiple centres throughout Canada and Europe.

After obtaining informed consent, all patient will have the LEFt clinical decision rule applied by the attending physician and will have D-Dimer testing (D-Dimer results of test performed within 24 hours will be accepted and do not need to be repeated).

Patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score of 0 or 1 point and a negative D-dimer will not undergo diagnostic imaging.

Patients with either a "likely" LEFt score of 2 or 3 points or a positive D-dimer will undergo either a single complete leg vein compression ultrasound (CCUS) (Day 1) or a serial proximal leg vein (CUS) (Day 1 and Day 7).

All patients will be followed for 3 months for symptomatic VTE.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2015-07-22
• Study First Submitted QC: 2015-07-22
• Study First Posted: 2015-07-23
• Study Start: 2015-09
• Status Verified: 2020-02
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-02-25
• Last Update Posted: 2020-02-27
• Primary Completion: 2021-09
• Study Completion: 2022-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 366

Inclusion Criteria

1. Unselected pregnant women (as self-reported by patient and/or previously documented positive beta hCG on urine or serum pregnancy tests) with

2. Suspected acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis, defined as:

   1. New leg swelling or edema with onset in the last month or,
   2. New leg pain (buttock, groin, thigh or calf) with onset in the last month.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Below the age of legal consent in jurisdiction of residence (18 years old for Quebec and 16 years old for rest of Canada)
2. Baseline imaging (imaging done after a minimum of 3 months of treatment for prior proximal DVT) not available if suspected recurrence in the same leg as prior
3. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
4. Concomitant symptoms of suspected pulmonary embolism (chest pain or shortness of breath or syncope/pre-syncope or unexplained tachycardia)
5. Therapeutic anticoagulant more than 48 hours.

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of VTE diagnosed in patients deemed DVT "unlikely"	3 months after presentation	The primary outcome will be the number of VTE (distal or proximal DVT, sub-segmental or greater pulmonary embolism (PE), death attributable to VTE) documented during the three-month follow-up in those patients left untreated for DVT on the basis of the study's initial diagnostic management (see Figure 2) i.e. not doing CUS on patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score (0 or 1 points) and a negative D-dimer

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of VTE diagnosed in all patients	3 months after presentation	The number of major VTE events (any proximal DVT, segmental or greater PE, death attributable to VTE) documented during the 3-month follow-up in all patients. Some clinicians may not treat distal DVT or sub-segmental PE in pregnancy, instead following these patients with serial US imaging, and hence may prefer to focus on this outcome that excludes distal DVT and sub-segmental PE.
Proportion of women requiring CUS	Baseline	The proportion of women requiring CUS using the study's diagnostic strategy (i.e. no imaging in patients with an "unlikely" LEFt score (0 or 1 points) and a negative D-dimer). We anticipate that an important proportion (\>40%) of women will be able to avoid the need for CUS imaging based on safely excluding DVT on the basis of an "unlikely" LEFt (0 or 1) and a negative D-dimer. However, if this proportion is very low (\<5%) this may argue against the widespread adoption of our proposed diagnostic management strategy even if it proves to be safe.
Average number of CUS in pregnant women with suspected DVT	7 days from initial presentation	The mean number of ultrasounds per patient with suspected DVT. In the study by Chan, validating serial CUS in pregnancy, the mean number of US per patient was 2.8630. We anticipate that we will be able to reduce this by \>40% with our diagnostic approach.

Trial Locations

Locations (12)

Intermountain Healthcare, Inc.; 🇺🇸 Murray, Utah, United States

Foothills Medical Centre; 🇨🇦 Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Royal Alexandra Hospital; 🇨🇦 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; 🇨🇦 Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre; 🇨🇦 Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Hamilton Health Sciences Centre; 🇨🇦 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

London Health Sciences Centre; 🇨🇦 London, Ontario, Canada

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 🇨🇦 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Sunnybrook Medical Hospital; 🇨🇦 Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Jewish General Hospital; 🇨🇦 Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Scroll for more (2 remaining)