Comparison of two techniques of upper limb block in upper limb surgeries
- Conditions
- Fracture of upper end of radius,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062198
- Lead Sponsor
- Shree krishna hospital,anand
- Brief Summary
After obtaining ethical committee approval and obtaining written and informed consent, patients
of ASA (American society of anaesthesia) I to ASA III physical status who is undergoing elective orthopedic
surgeries the level below the shoulder and distally will be recruited to participate in study. It is a
observational study. Sixty patients will be devided randomly to either ultrasound guided vs peripheral nerve
stimulator guided the supraclavicular block using winpepi software.
Pre anaesthetic check up will be carried out in all patients with detailed clinical history, general
history, as well as general and systemic examination. After checking the overnight fasting of 6-8hours,
arrival to anaesthetic room, an i.v line, a blood pressure cuff and pulse oximetry probe will be attached to
non operated arm. All block will be performed by the 2nd and 3rd year resident with experience of
performing 10-15 blocks using ultrasound under the supervision of an experienced anesthesiologist. A
randomization envelope opened at this stage and the patient will be allocated to either group US or NS. All
block will be performed by the first anesthesiologist who will take no further part in that case management.
Sedation will be administered until the evaluation of the block is completed if required.
· After obtaining written informed consent from all subjects, 60 adult patients, who were American Society
of Anaesthesiology physical status I-III and scheduled for electiveor emergency upper limb surgery will be
studied prospectively.
· The study will be conducted in 2 years from october 2022 to october 2024.
· Total of 60 patients will be enrolled in this observational study and will be randomly divided into two
groups: US (Group US) and NS (Group NS).
All the patients will be fasted adequately. In the operation theatre, patients will be monitored with pulse
oximetry, non invasive blood pressure, and electro cardiogram. After establishing an intravenous access, the
patients received inj. midazolam 1 mg intravenously. No other sedation will be given till evaluation of the
block gets completed.
· The patients will be randomly allotted by closed envelope technique into either of the two groups namely,
US-guided (group US) or NS-guided (group NS). The respective equipment will be kept ready and the drugs
will be loaded maintaining sterility. The drug used will be a 1:1 mixture of 0.5% ropivacaine and 2%
lignocaine with 1:200000 adrenaline. The amount of local anaesthetic injected calculated according to the
body weight and not crossing the toxic dosage (inj. Ropivacaine 4 mg/kg, inj. lignocaine with adrenaline 7
mg/kg). The patients will be positioned supine with the arms by the side and head turned to the opposite side
by 45°. The proposed site of block will be aseptically prepared and draped.
Group US
The probe will be inserted into a sterile plastic sheath so as to maintain sterility. It will be placed in the
coronal oblique plane in the supraclavicular area. The subclavian artery, vein, and the brachial plexus will be
visualized. The brachial plexus and its spatial relationship to the surrounding structures will be scanned. The
plexus will be identified superolateral to the subclavian artery consistently in all the cases. Next, skin will be
anesthetized at the proposed site of entry with 2% lignocaine (2 mL) and a 20 G, 50 mm needle will be
connected to a 50 cm extension line and primed with the drug. It will be inserted from the lateral to medial
direction and the needle movement was observed in real time. Once the needle reached the plexus, after
negative aspiration, drug will be injected and the spread of the drug will
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Patients ASA(american society of anaesthesia) I, II and III physical status 2)Age 18-70yrs of either sex 3)Patients undergoing upper limb surgery.
- Patients refusal to regional anaesthesia 2) Skin infection located on or near block injection site 3) Allergy to local anesthetics 4) Presence of bleeding disorder or coagulopathy 5) Patients with preexisting neurological deficit of the same limb 6) Psychiatric disorder 7) Bilateral upper limb surgery 8) Severe chronic obstructive or restrictive lung disease 9) Requirement of conversion to general anaesthesia due to inadequate block.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 2)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Block success rate 10-20mins 3)To compare the hemodynamic parameters: Heart-rate, systolic & diastolic blood pressure, oxygen 10-20mins saturation & complications like vascular punctures, pneumothorax, nerve palsies, hematoma formation 10-20mins and infection at injection site. 10-20mins 1)Assess the efficacy & procedure duration in view of onset of sensory blockade in 10-20mins supraclavicular block ultra sound guided vs peripheral nerve stimulator guided block. 10-20mins Secondary outcome 10-20mins 1)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Onset of sensory and 10-20mins motor block. 10-20mins
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1)to compare the two techniques of supraclavicular block in terms of Onset of sensory and motor block.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Shree krishna hospital karamsad
🇮🇳Anand, GUJARAT, India
Shree krishna hospital karamsad🇮🇳Anand, GUJARAT, IndiaDrVatsal parikhPrincipal investigator8200643179vatsalparikh.vp@gmail.com