MedPath

Feasibility of an Automated Bidet Intervention to Decrease Caregiver Burden

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Caregiver Burnout
Interventions
Behavioral: Automated Bidet
Other: No Intervention
Registration Number
NCT04283123
Lead Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the feasibility, including acceptability and preliminary efficacy, of an automated bidet intervention to make it easier for caregivers to assist with toileting.

Detailed Description

Informal caregivers provide over 30 billion hours of care to older adults each year. They often assist with toileting tasks which are often identified as one of the most physically and emotionally demanding activities of daily living. Caregivers receive limited training and support which increases their risk for injury and burnout. One potential strategy to reduce or replace the physical support needed from a caregiver is the used of an automated bidet system. It remains unknown whether an automated bidet can be used successfully with older adults and their caregivers at home. The objective of this feasibility study was to assess the acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a toileting intervention using an automated bidet system and training by an occupational therapy practitioner (OT) to reduce the amount of physical assistance required from caregivers.

The investigators will recruit 10 informal caregivers and randomize them to the treatment or waitlist control group. Caregivers in the treatment group will receive the automated bidet right away while those in the waitlist control group will not receive any treatment during that time. After 30 days, both groups will participate in a post-test assessment visit. The waitlist control group will then be offered the intervention and invited to participate in a final session after 30 days to complete assessments and a process evaluation (30 days post follow-up).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • (1) provided unpaid care and lived with a care recipient aged 55 years or older
  • (2) assisted with toileting for at least 6 months
  • (3) did not have an automated bidet
  • (4) had a working toilet and bathroom outlet, and (5) their care recipient was willing to participate
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Caregivers scoring 10 or above on the Short Blessed Test, indicating possible cognitive impairment
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TreatmentAutomated BidetParticipants assigned to this group will receive an automated bidet (TOTO Washlet S300e with remote control) and an occupational therapy intervention over 3-4 in-home visits.
Waitlist ControlNo InterventionCaregivers will wait for 30 days and then will be offered the intervention.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adverse EventsAt study completion (2 months [treatment] or 3 months [waitlist control])

Number of adverse events was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Number of Participants Recruited5 months

The ability to recruit 10 caregivers who were eligible for the study was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Number of Caregivers RetainedAt study completion (2 months [treatment] or 3 months [waitlist control])

Retain 10 caregivers was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Number of Participants With Ability to Install the Automated Bidets, Including Any Modifications Needed30 days post-installation

Installation of the automated bidets and a record of any modifications needed was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Number of Caregivers' or Care Recipients' Who Can Operate the Bidet30 days post-installation

Demonstrate ability to operate the bidet successfully which was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Acceptability30 days post-installation

8-item process evaluation: rated on a scale of 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with higher scores indicating greater acceptance of the intervention

Preliminary Efficacy: Performance2 months (treatment) or 3 months (waitlist control)

In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation for Providing Assistance impact on caregiver outcomes rated on a scale of 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better performance was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Preliminary Efficacy: Satisfaction2 months (treatment) or 3 months (waitlist control)

In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation for Providing Assistance: impact on caregiver outcomes rated on a scale of 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better satisfaction was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Preliminary Efficacy: Self-efficacy2 months (treatment) or 3 months (waitlist control)

In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation for Providing Assistance: impact on caregiver outcomes rated on a scale of 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Preliminary Efficacy: Physical Environmental Barriers2 months (treatment) or 3 months (waitlist control)

In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation for Providing Assistance: reduction of physical barriers to toileting (rated on a scale from 0 (independent) to 5 (no activity/dependent) was used with other variables to assess feasibility

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath