RBR-248jys
Active, not recruiting
未知
Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1: 100.000 Epinephrine by the Vestibular Infiltration Technique
niversidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM0 sitesOctober 22, 2019
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pulpitis
- Sponsor
- niversidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Painful symptomatology in one or more mandibular molars; symptomatic irreversible pulpitis; ASA I and ASA II patients; teeth that can be isolated and rehabilitated
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients under 18 years of age; pregnant and lactating women; allergic to local anesthetics; using drugs that alter the pain threshold; teeth with open apex; root fracture; absence of lip numbness
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A clinical study to know the effectiveness of local anesthesia 4% Articaine and opioid Tramadol hydrochloride injection in the removal of teeth in upper back tooth region.CTRI/2023/08/056495Ch Naveen
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing of the efficay of Articaine and Lidocaine on Anesthesia of Maxillary first Molars in 4-6years old childreIRCT2017101036699N1Vice chancellor for research, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences74
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% Lidocaine for maxillary Buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. a randomized double- blined clinical trialirreversible pulpitis.IRCT201204302016N5Vice chancellor for research; Kerman University of Medical Sciences50
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Comparative pain management of local anesthetic drugs when placed at the site.CTRI/2018/03/012678R Seshan Rakkesh
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparing anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine and 2% Lidocaine in mandibular bone graftsIRCT20230210057378N1Qazvin University of Medical Sciences20