MIME THERAPY vs MOTOR IMAGERY TECHNIQUE in Bell's Palsy
- Conditions
- Bell Palsy
- Registration Number
- NCT06340009
- Lead Sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Brief Summary
- Bell's palsy, characterized by unilateral paralysis/paresis of facial muscles, is a condition with a significant impact on individuals' lives. It was first identified by scientist Sir Charles Bell, and its sudden onset can lead to social, psychological, and emotional distress. Left untreated, Bell's palsy can have long-lasting effects on a patient's quality of life, including loss of facial muscle control, emotional stress, and communication difficulties. Rehabilitation protocols encompass various physical therapy techniques, among which Mime therapy and Motor imagery technique have shown promise. 
- Detailed Description
- While rehabilitation protocols have shown promise in enhancing facial muscle control, reducing disability, and preventing long-term complications, there remains a critical gap in the literature regarding the comparative effectiveness of various rehabilitation techniques. Currently, there is limited empirical evidence to guide healthcare professionals in selecting the most suitable rehabilitation approach for individual patients. The purpose of this study is to address this gap in knowledge by comparing two specific rehabilitation techniques: Mime therapy and Motor imagery technique. Understanding which of these rehabilitation techniques is more effective can significantly influence clinical practice and patient care. By conducting a systematic comparison, this study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to healthcare professionals in selection of appropriate rehabilitation protocol for Bell's palsy patients. 
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 44
- Age 20-40 years
- Both male and female
- Patients diagnosed with Bell's Palsy
- Paralysis/paresis of all muscle groups of one side of face
- Patients diagnosed with facial palsy
- Patients with impaired cognition
- Patients diagnosed with other neurological diseases
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
- Name - Time - Method - Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) - week 6 - An assessment tool specifically designed to evaluate synkinesis- related symptoms. Assesses the presence and severity of synkinesis symptoms during voluntary actions. - Uses a questionnaire. - Higher scores indicate more severe synkinesis-related symptoms. - House-Brackmann Scale (HBS) - week 6 - A widely used scale to assess facial nerve dysfunction.Grades facial muscle function from I (normal) to VI (total paralysis). - Higher scores indicate more severe dysfunction. - Facial Disability Index (FDI) - week 6 - A patient-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of facial palsy on daily life.Assesses physical, social, and emotional functioning - Uses a questionnaire. - Higher scores indicate a greater impact on daily life. - Sunnybrook Facial Grading System - week 6 - An assessment tool for evaluating facial muscle function, including static and dynamic aspects. 
- Secondary Outcome Measures
- Name - Time - Method 
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
- Muzaffar Hospital 🇵🇰- Sargodha, Pakistan Muzaffar Hospital🇵🇰Sargodha, PakistanMulazam Imran, MS-NMPT*Contact
