MedPath

MIME THERAPY vs MOTOR IMAGERY TECHNIQUE in Bell's Palsy

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bell Palsy
Registration Number
NCT06340009
Lead Sponsor
Riphah International University
Brief Summary

Bell's palsy, characterized by unilateral paralysis/paresis of facial muscles, is a condition with a significant impact on individuals' lives. It was first identified by scientist Sir Charles Bell, and its sudden onset can lead to social, psychological, and emotional distress. Left untreated, Bell's palsy can have long-lasting effects on a patient's quality of life, including loss of facial muscle control, emotional stress, and communication difficulties. Rehabilitation protocols encompass various physical therapy techniques, among which Mime therapy and Motor imagery technique have shown promise.

Detailed Description

While rehabilitation protocols have shown promise in enhancing facial muscle control, reducing disability, and preventing long-term complications, there remains a critical gap in the literature regarding the comparative effectiveness of various rehabilitation techniques. Currently, there is limited empirical evidence to guide healthcare professionals in selecting the most suitable rehabilitation approach for individual patients. The purpose of this study is to address this gap in knowledge by comparing two specific rehabilitation techniques: Mime therapy and Motor imagery technique. Understanding which of these rehabilitation techniques is more effective can significantly influence clinical practice and patient care. By conducting a systematic comparison, this study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations to healthcare professionals in selection of appropriate rehabilitation protocol for Bell's palsy patients.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 20-40 years
  • Both male and female
  • Patients diagnosed with Bell's Palsy
  • Paralysis/paresis of all muscle groups of one side of face
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients diagnosed with facial palsy
  • Patients with impaired cognition
  • Patients diagnosed with other neurological diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)week 6

An assessment tool specifically designed to evaluate synkinesis- related symptoms. Assesses the presence and severity of synkinesis symptoms during voluntary actions. - Uses a questionnaire. - Higher scores indicate more severe synkinesis-related symptoms.

House-Brackmann Scale (HBS)week 6

A widely used scale to assess facial nerve dysfunction.Grades facial muscle function from I (normal) to VI (total paralysis). - Higher scores indicate more severe dysfunction.

Facial Disability Index (FDI)week 6

A patient-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of facial palsy on daily life.Assesses physical, social, and emotional functioning - Uses a questionnaire. - Higher scores indicate a greater impact on daily life.

Sunnybrook Facial Grading Systemweek 6

An assessment tool for evaluating facial muscle function, including static and dynamic aspects.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Muzaffar Hospital

🇵🇰

Sargodha, Pakistan

Muzaffar Hospital
🇵🇰Sargodha, Pakistan
Mulazam Imran, MS-NMPT*
Contact

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.