Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01092624
NCT01092624TerminatedPhase 4

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Parallel-Design Trial of the Effect of Solifenacin Treatment for Overactive Bladder in Women With Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse Managed With a Pessary (the "PESSARY" Study)

Hartford Hospital1 site in 1 country94 target enrollmentStarted: March 2010Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 4
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
94
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The Effect of These Therapies on Over-Active Bladder Symptoms

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the effect of pessary therapy, with and without Solifenacin (Vesicare), on symptoms of over active bladder and bladder function in women with overactive bladder symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse.

Study Hypotheses:

Null hypothesis, HO: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does not improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo.

Alternate hypothesis, HA: Reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and treatment with solifenacin does improve overactive bladder symptoms more than reduction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and placebo.

Detailed Description

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects approximately half of all women over age 501. The most common type of POP is anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Symptoms associated with POP include: voiding dysfunction, defecatory dysfunction and vaginal bulge symptoms. Treatments for pelvic organ prolapse include among other options, vaginal pessary or surgery. Several studies have documented improved vaginal bulge symptoms in women treated with a pessary2,3,4; however, data are sparse regarding the effect of pessaries on lower urinary tract symptoms, specifically with regard to over active bladder symptoms.

Overactive bladder, observed in approximately 40% of women 50 years of age or older, is very common in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Two retrospective studies have shown improvement in women with overactive bladder symptoms following treatment with a vaginal pessary. One study (using a non-validated questionnaire) found that, at two month follow-up, patients successfully fitted with a pessary experienced a reduction in slightly less than half of their urge incontinence symptoms.5 A second study (using the Sheffield pelvic organ prolapse symptom questionnaire), revealed that 4 months after insertion of a pessary, 38% of patients experienced reduced urinary urgency, and 29% experienced reduced urge urinary incontinence6. Despite these data, many women stop using a pessary secondary to complaints of increased urine incontinence. More information is needed on pessary therapy impact on bladder function.

Specific Aim(s):

This study will prospectively evaluate women with pelvic organ prolapse and overactive bladder symptoms treated with either

  1. a pessary and solifenacin, or
  2. a pessary and placebo. We will assess the effects of these therapies on overactive bladder symptoms over the course of the 14-week study.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Have experienced symptoms of overactive bladder (e.g., urinary urgency, frequency, or urge incontinence) for at least 3 months. Specifically women must average 8 or more voids in 24 hours and have 3 or more episodes of urinary urgency or urge incontinence over the 72 hours when the diary is being completed.
  • A practitioner trained in the pelvic organ prolapse quantification examination will evaluate each woman's pelvic organ support and vaginal dimensions. Women with a stage 1 or greater vaginal prolapse will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The presence of factors that would contraindicate use of antimuscarinic medications (e.g. urine retention, narrow angle glaucoma, uncontrolled constipation, dementia)
  • An existing condition that would contraindicate use of a vaginal pessary (e.g., patient's vaginal length <6 cm)
  • Patient is currently using a vaginal pessary.
  • Patient is unable to tolerate an object in vagina
  • Patient has a history of cervical, vaginal or endometrial cancer
  • Patient is not able to speak English
  • Patient is currently using an anticholinergic medication, or has used one in the past 30 days
  • Patients with mixed urine incontinence that is predominantly stress urine incontinence (determined by their baseline PFDI)
  • Patients with a known allergy to solifenacin.
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Arms & Interventions

Pessary and solifenacin

Experimental

Intervention: Solifenacin (Drug)

Pessary and solifenacin

Experimental

Intervention: Ring pessary with support, Cooper Surgical, Trumbell, CT Ref # MXPRS03 non-latex (Device)

Pessary and placebo

Placebo Comparator

Intervention: Placebo (Drug)

Pessary and placebo

Placebo Comparator

Intervention: Ring pessary with support, Cooper Surgical, Trumbell, CT Ref # MXPRS03 non-latex (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The Effect of These Therapies on Over-Active Bladder Symptoms

Time Frame: 14-Weeks

Using the PFDI and PFIQ and a standardized medication response questionnaire to assess each subject's response to either the placebo or the solinefacin at Week 6 and Week 14, we will evaluate the effect of these therapies on subjects' bladder symptoms over the course of the study.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials