MedPath

Comprehensive Management for Terminal Heart Failure Program:

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Heart Failure
Registration Number
NCT06892652
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

Advanced heart failure presents with various symptoms, including pain, dyspnea, functional decline, reduced quality of life, and physiological deterioration, which can ultimately lead to spiritual distress. The functional losses experienced by patients-encompassing physical, social, and mental aspects-place a significant burden on caregivers, impacting their physical, mental, and spiritual well-being. This burden is further intensified by the stress of making major medical decisions, highlighting the need for palliative care that extends beyond the patient. Addressing how to holistically support both patients and caregivers is a key focus of palliative care.

Studies have shown that integrating palliative care with heart failure treatment significantly improves patients' quality of life, as well as their comfort and dignity at the end of life. Evidence from multiple studies demonstrates the benefits of palliative care for heart failure patients, including enhanced quality of life, reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and increased participation in advance care planning discussions. Consequently, national guidelines in several countries, including the United States and Europe, recommend the early integration of specialist palliative care for heart failure patients. However, the optimal timing for intervention by palliative care specialists remains undetermined.

This study aims to develop and assess the feasibility and effectiveness of the Comprehensive Management for Terminal Heart Failure (COMFORT-HF) program. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which will receive the COMFORT-HF model, or the control group, which will receive usual care. The implementation of the COMFORT-HF model involves heart failure case managers conducting screenings to identify patients for referral to a specialist palliative care team. Once the shared decision-making process is initiated and both the patient and the primary heart failure care team agree, palliative care specialists and shared care nurses will collaborate with the heart failure team to provide comprehensive, coordinated care, including regular visits.

The study aim to validate that the COMFORT-HF model produces positive outcomes for patients with advanced heart failure, making it a promising approach for broader implementation and promotion.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Congestive heart failure at stage C or D
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. Able to communicate in Chinese or Taiwanese
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Pregnant women
  2. Patients who have previously received palliative care services

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)days 0, months 6, months 12

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health-related quality of life. It consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems.

Scoring Range: The EQ-5D-5L utility score ranges from -0.594 to 1, where 1 represents full health, 0 represents death, and negative values represent health states worse than death.

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireDay 0, months 6, months 12

The KCCQ is a disease-specific instrument designed to assess health status in heart failure patients. It includes multiple domains: physical limitation, symptom frequency, symptom burden, social limitation, and quality of life. The questionnaire generates an overall Total Summary Score (TSS).

Scoring Range:

Each domain score ranges from 0 to 100. The Total Summary Score (TSS) ranges from 0 to 100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better health status, fewer symptoms, and improved quality of life. A lower score represents worse symptoms and greater functional impairment.

Quality of Dying Evaluation Form in the Hospice and Palliative Care Unit at National Taiwan University HospitalDuring the intervention, If patient passed away

This is a validated tool specifically designed to assess the quality of dying in terminally ill patients receiving hospice and palliative care. It evaluates multiple aspects, including symptom control, comfort, dignity, emotional support, and communication.

score ranging from 0 to 15 to summarize the extent to which the death was considered good. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better quality of dying (e.g., better symptom relief, patient dignity, and family satisfaction), while lower scores suggest greater suffering or unmet needs.

Spiritual well-being scaleDay 0, months 6, months 12

The SWBS is a self-report questionnaire assessing two dimensions of spiritual well-being: Religious Well-Being (RWB) (connection to a higher power) and Existential Well-Being (EWB) (sense of life meaning and satisfaction). It consists of 20 items.

Scoring Range:

Each item is scored on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree).

The total score ranges from 20 to 120. The Religious Well-Being subscale ranges from 10 to 60, and the Existential Well-Being subscale also ranges from 10 to 60.

Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater spiritual well-being, while lower scores suggest spiritual distress or dissatisfaction.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath