跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04008680
NCT04008680Unknown不适用

Collection of Remotely Administered Multiple Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (CRAM-PROMs) in Orthopaedic Trauma: Assessment of the Impact of Quantity on Quality

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 110 人开始时间: 2021年5月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
110
试验地点
1
主要终点
Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L

研究概览

简要总结

This study investigates how reliability of patient reported outcomes can be affected with questionnaire burden and and the number of questionnaires given to study participants.

详细描述

The primary objective of the study is to determine if the number of remotely administered questionnaires completed by fracture patients affects the psychometric properties of a questionnaire itself. We will assess the internal consistency of the EuroQuol Five Dimension - Five Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health Survey questionnaire as more questionnaires are applied.

The secondary objective is to evaluate how the number of questionnaires and the time it takes to complete them impact patient's preferences and values. We will measure the time taken by each participant to complete the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire to evaluate if it changes meaningfully as the number of questionnaires given to participants' increases. Additionally, we will assess patient preferences and values by asking how well the remotely collected PROMs reflect their health status, and how this changes relative to the number of questionnaires administered.

Our hypothesis is that there is a progressive decline in psychometric properties in the EQ-5D-5L, both in reliability and validity, as we increase the number of questionnaires given to participants. We also hypothesize that the time to complete the ED-5D-5L will increase as the number of questionnaires given to participants' increases, and that there is a threshold at which the patient feels there are no additional value to completing additional remote PROMS to adequately reflect their health status.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The patient presents to the in-person or virtual fracture clinic for his/her own appointment.
  • The patient has a fracture that is being managed either operatively or non-operatively.
  • Fracture occurred in the past 6 months.
  • The patient is 18 years of age or older.
  • The patient is able to read, understand, and write in English.
  • Patient provides informed, verbal or written consent.

排除标准

  • The patient is considered too ill or injured to participate in the study.
  • The patient is cognitively impaired, intoxicated or otherwise unable to provide consent or participate in the study.
  • The patient is co-enrolled in another study requiring completion of multiple additional PROMs.

结局指标

主要结局

Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L

时间窗: Day 1

The questionnaire selected to analyze reliability in our population is the EQ-5D-5L.This well-known, generic, patient-reported health questionnaire is frequently used in musculoskeletal research and has shown to have a good internal consistency. We will compute the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. We will contrast these results to analyze if there is any difference in the values obtained from the answers of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire between the four groups.

次要结局

  • Time to completion(Day 1)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验