MedPath

CarboMedics Top Hat vs St. Jude Medical Regent Valve Comparing Sizing and Hemodynamics

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Aortic Valve Disease
Interventions
Device: Top Hat
Device: Regent
Registration Number
NCT00619151
Lead Sponsor
Sorin Group USA, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the sizing and implant techniques between the CarboMedics Top Hat supra-annular valve and the St. Jude Medical Regent valve.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
2
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are indicated for implant with a mechanical valve prosthesis in the aortic position according to the current practice for valve selection at the center.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients < 18 years of age
  • Emergency surgery
  • Pre-existing valve prosthesis
  • Aortic root replacement
  • Active endocarditis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1Top HatCarboMedics Supra-annular Top Hat Valve
2RegentSt. Jude Medical Regent Valve
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Effective Orifice Area (EOA)6 month evaluation

Effective Orifice Area of the prosthetic valve measured via echocardiography to determine physiological area of blood flow through the valve.

Aortic Mean Gradient6 months

Mean gradient measured across the aortic prosthetic valve via echocardiography to determine mean pressure of blood flow across the valve.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Johns Hopkins Hospital

🇺🇸

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center

🇺🇸

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath