CarboMedics Top Hat vs St. Jude Medical Regent Valve Comparing Sizing and Hemodynamics
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Top HatDevice: Regent
- Registration Number
- NCT00619151
- Lead Sponsor
- Sorin Group USA, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the sizing and implant techniques between the CarboMedics Top Hat supra-annular valve and the St. Jude Medical Regent valve.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2
- Patients who are indicated for implant with a mechanical valve prosthesis in the aortic position according to the current practice for valve selection at the center.
- Patients < 18 years of age
- Emergency surgery
- Pre-existing valve prosthesis
- Aortic root replacement
- Active endocarditis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 Top Hat CarboMedics Supra-annular Top Hat Valve 2 Regent St. Jude Medical Regent Valve
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effective Orifice Area (EOA) 6 month evaluation Effective Orifice Area of the prosthetic valve measured via echocardiography to determine physiological area of blood flow through the valve.
Aortic Mean Gradient 6 months Mean gradient measured across the aortic prosthetic valve via echocardiography to determine mean pressure of blood flow across the valve.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
🇺🇸Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
🇺🇸Kingsport, Tennessee, United States