Comparison Between Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants
- Conditions
- Dental ImplantsDental Implants, Single-tooth
- Registration Number
- NCT06682559
- Lead Sponsor
- Alexandria University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment.
- Detailed Description
Volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg with convex emergence profile in comparison to customized healing abutment with concave emergence profile.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 24
-
Adult patients who are classified as ASA I or II physical status and require mandibular single implants (single missing mandibular posterior teeth) with:
- Proper bone height and width.
- Adequate zone of keratinized tissue (at least 2 mm)
- Any systematic disease as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or metabolic bone diseases
- Pregnancy and Lactation
- A history of head and neck radiation treatment.
- Chronic periodontal diseases.
- Poor oral hygiene (Silness-Löe plaque index score 2 and 3)
- Parafunctional habits.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume 3 months Each participant will undergo volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months healing either after using prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment using a 3D meteorology software (GOM inspect). It will be measured in millimeter cube
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
🇪🇬Alexandria, Egypt