Double Lock Versus Continuous Non-locking Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Cesarean Sections on Post-operative Pain
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
- Enrollment
- 150
- Primary Endpoint
- postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
Study Overview
Brief Summary
In this trial we compare the effect of 2 closure techniques of the rectus sheath during cesarean sections on postoperative pain. One closure technique is double lock technique and the other is the conventional continuous non-locking technique.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- Female
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •first cesarean section
Exclusion Criteria
- •urgent cesarean section
- •previous abdominal surgery
- •previous cesarean section
- •obstetric and medical complications
Arms & Interventions
group a
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with double locking technique for closure of Rectus Sheath.
Intervention: lower segment cesarean section and double lock closure of rectus sheath (Procedure)
group b
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with continuous non-locking technique for closure of rectus sheath.
Intervention: lower segment cesarean section and continuous non-locking closure of rectus sheath (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
Time Frame: first week postoperative
Secondary Outcomes
- operative time(intraoperative)
Investigators
dr mohammed elsafty
Associate Professor
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital