MedPath

Short-Term Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Upper Extremity Function in Subjects With Poststroke Hemiplegia

Not Applicable
Conditions
Upper Extremity
Stroke
Hemiplegia
Physical Therapy Modalities
Rehabilitation
Electromyography
Recovery of Function
Vibration
Interventions
Device: whole-body vibration training
Other: conventional upper limb training
Registration Number
NCT03963258
Lead Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
Brief Summary

To investigate the effect of whole body vibration on upper limb motor function in hemiplegic patients with subacute stroke

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • After unilateral stroke 1 to 6 months
  • An ischemic or hemorrhagic poststroke hemiplegia
  • No cognitive impairment
  • Able to reach Brunnstrom stage II or above in the proximal and distal parts of the arms
  • No excessive pain in the more affected upper extremity
  • All subjects agreed to participate in the study after receiving explanations regarding the purpose and procedures of the experiment, and they signed an informed consent statement before participation
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unsteadiness
  • Accompanied by important organs (such as heart, liver, lung, kidney) dysfunction or malignant tumors
  • Contraindications to general vibration training exist
  • Combined with other diseases causing upper limb dysfunction
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
whole-body vibration groupwhole-body vibration trainingSubjects in the whole-body vibration group received half an hour of daily conventional upper limb training, followed by whole-body vibration training for an additional half hour per day,5 days per week during a 3-week period
control groupconventional upper limb trainingOver a 3-week period, the subjects in the control group received 1 hour daily of conventional upper limb training 5 times a week,including compensatory techniques for activities of daily living, UE strength, therapist-guided techniques for facilitating normal UE movement patterns,and range of motion and traditional positioning
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer ScaleAfter the 3-week intervention period

the assessment is scored by summing item ratings and reporting the aggregate score out of 66 points,with higher scores representing a greater UE motor ability summing item ratings and reporting the aggregate score out of 66 points, with higher scores representing a greater UE motor ability

Wolf Motor Function TestAfter the 3-week intervention period

participants were timed as they completed 15 activities that progressively involved more difficult arm movements and interactions with objects such as lifting a soda can, stacking checkers, and folding a towel. We reported the average time to perform the 15 items and the evaluator rated the normalcy of these items with a 6-point ordinal scale (range,0-5) using the functional ability scale.

Surface electromyographyAfter the 3-week intervention period

Surface electromyography was used to measure the integrated EMG(IEMG)of the biceps and triceps during maximum isometric voluntary contraction(MIVC)of the affected elbow flexion and extension and then the co-contraction rate(CR)was calculated

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Peking Univercity Third Hospital

🇨🇳

Beijing, No State Or Province, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath