Intraoral Scanners as Periodontal and Dental Pathologies Diagnosis Tools

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Periodontitis; Dental Caries; Diagnosis; Gingivitis
• Interventions: Other: Numerical dental impression by intraoral scanner

• Registration Number: NCT06006429
• Lead Sponsor: CHU de Reims

Brief Summary

Periodontal diseases and dental pathologies are highly prevalent oral diseases. Thirty-three to fifty percent of adult population presented at least one untreated caries and more than 50% of French population are affected by severe periodontitis. These diseases affect dental organ or periodontal attached system but could have negative impact on general health, quality of life, word and individual well-being. Association between chronic diseases as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and oral health have been well investigated. Dental and periodontal diagnosis is dependent of various clinical parameters time consuming and dependent operator. It represents a public health challenge. Informatic analysis detecting diseases could be a time gain and a more precise diagnosis tool. Today, any software or algorithm allow automatized detection, clinical qualitative or quantitative indices recording while these informations are present in numeric models

Detailed Description

The present study explores the effectiveness of intraoral scanners in the field of dental caries and periodontal diseases diagnosis Patients presenting at least on recession are recruited without randomization. A clinical examination is performed, and a 3D impression of their mouth is obtained by intraoral scanners.

The investigators hypothesized that the 3D intra oral representations could improve oral diagnosis in patients compared to clinical examination in term of time consummation and precision. In a first time, this could be achieved by the comparison of the recession measurement obtained by a clinical measure (Ramfjord, 1959) or obtained by artificial intelligence.

The secondary objectives are :

* To compare clinical and numerical dento-prosthetic diagram

* To compare clinical and numerical plaque control record index (O'Leary et al., 1973)

* To compare clinical and numerical Decayed, Missed and Filled Teeth index (Klein and Palmer, 1940)

* To compare clinical and numerical detection of mucosal lesions

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2022-05-11
• Study First Submitted: 2023-08-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-08-17
• Study First Posted: 2023-08-23
• Status Verified: 2024-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-04-24
• Last Update Posted: 2024-04-26
• Primary Completion: 2026-12-11
• Study Completion: 2026-12-11

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 30

Inclusion Criteria

• adultes
• consulting the Dental Care Service of the university hospital of Reims
• presenting at least one gingival recession
• presenting at least 10 pairs of opposing teeth
• speaking French
• who signed the informed consent form
• affiliated to the French Social Security system

Exclusion Criteria

Patients presenting :

• pregnancy or breastfeeding
• orthodontic treatments
• patients under legal protection, trusteeship or guardianship
• unable to understand auto-questionnary

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Patients	Numerical dental impression by intraoral scanner	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Recession measurement concordance (Ramfjord, 1959)	Day 1	Recession depths is measured between the cementum-enamel junction and the edge of the marginal gingiva.; The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Dento-prosthetic diagram concordance	Day 1	Recording the presence or absence of tooth The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.
Mucosal lesions detection	Day 1	Presence or absence of mucosal lesions.; The clinical and numerical lesions will be compared.
Plaque Control Record Concordance (O'Leary et al., 1972)	Day 1	Plaque control record will be recorded on individual tooth surfaces (mesial, distal, facial, lingual).; PCR is calculated according the following formula : PCR = (Number of faces with plaque / Total number of faces) x 100; The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.
Gingival Index Concordance (Loe and Silness, 1963)	Day 1	Gingival index is scored as described : 0 Normal gingival Natural coral pink gingival with no inflammation; 1. Mild inflammation Slight changes in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing; 2. Moderate inflammation Redness, edema and glazing Bleeding under probing; 3. Severe inflammation Marked redness and edema/ulceration Tendency to bleed spontaneously; The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.
Decayed, Missed and Filled Teeth Index (Klein and Palmer, 1940)	Day 1	DMFT is the sum of decayed, missed due to caries and filled teech in the permanent teeth.; Third molars are excepted.; The clinical and numerical scored will be compared.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Damien JOLLY; 🇫🇷 Reims, France