CTRI/2022/01/039457尚未招募未知
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF BUFFERED AND NONBUFFERED 4% ARTICAINE (WITH ADRENALINE 1:100000) INFILTRATION FOR PRIMARY MAXILLARY MOLAR EXTRACTIONS : AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY.
Dr Parag Sadashiv Dhake0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Children Having at least one primary maxillary molar indicated for extraction
- •under local anaesthetic.
- •Children who exhibited Franklââ?¬•s behavior rating grade three or four i.e positive
- •and definitely positive.
排除标准
- •Children with active infection at the site of injection.
- •Children with known history of allergy to any local anaesthetic agent.
- •History of major dental treatment in last 6 months.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
4 期
Clinical Comparison Of Zirconia Crown With Glass Reinforced Fibre Composite Crown (Gfrc)CTRI/2020/06/026051Dr Abhinav Talekar30
已完成
不适用
Comparative analysis of the clinical effectiveness for capillary blood sampling in term newborns: laser lancing device versus automatic incision device.KCT0004901Korea University Ansan Hospital42
尚未招募
4 期
Comparison of two Indian based chemical agents for caries removalCTRI/2024/06/069096Dr Shyam Sivasamy
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparing clinical effectiveness of orthodontic cases with post treatment applianceCTRI/2023/06/054134Institute of Dental sciences
招募中
3 期
Effect of two Antihistamines in Chronic Urticaria PatientsCTRI/2023/10/059058Rajendra institute of medical sciences