Volumetric Changes in Large Cystic Lesions Using Active Decompression and Distraction Sugosteogenesis vs Passive Decompression

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Odontogenic Cysts
• Interventions: Device: Active decompression

• Registration Number: NCT06262802
• Lead Sponsor: Radwa Hydar Ragab

Brief Summary

Null hypothesis active decompression and distraction sugosteogenesis is not faster than passive decompression in volume reduction of large cystic lesions

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2024-02
• Study First Submitted: 2024-02-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-02-14
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-02-14
• Study First Posted: 2024-02-16
• Last Update Posted: 2024-02-16
• Study Start: 2024-03-01
• Primary Completion: 2024-09-01
• Study Completion: 2025-03-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

• any patient with large cystic lesion

Exclusion Criteria

• any patient can't follow home instructions

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Intervention	Active decompression	-
Control	Active decompression	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Volume change	2weeks/one and 6 months	Percentage of volume changes over time