Comparison between cuff inflation technique with neck flexion versus conventional technique to aid nasotracheal intubation using video-laryngoscope - A randomised clinical trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare ease of nasotracheal intubationusing cuff inflation technique with neck flexion versus conventional technique using a magills forceps
研究概览
简要总结
This study aims to assess the ease and safety during nasotracheal intubation using cuff inflation technique along with neck flexion which is relatively safer than using a magills forceps with may cause trauma to oropharyngeal mucosa and also may tear the tube cuff. This study also helps to asses the time consumed with both the techniques and thus guide regarding which method offers faster intubation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •ASA grades 1 and 2, Elective surgeries under general anesthesia requiring nasotracheal intubation, Mouth opening more than 5 cm, Provides consent for the study.
排除标准
- •Contraindication to general anesthesia and nasotracheal intubation, Refusal to provide consent for the study, Emergency surgery, Mouth opening less than 5 cm, Nasal trauma or bleed.
结局指标
主要结局
To compare ease of nasotracheal intubationusing cuff inflation technique with neck flexion versus conventional technique using a magills forceps
时间窗: Procedure will be completed within 120 seconds. If it exceeds 120 seconds, the study will be abandoned in view of patient safety
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Kishore B J
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi
