Peer Support for Post Intensive Care Syndrome Self-Management
- Conditions
- Respiratory FailureShock, HypovolemicCritical IllnessShock, SepticChronic DiseaseRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultSepsisShock
- Registration Number
- NCT03788096
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Texas at Austin
- Brief Summary
A prospective, 2-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical feasibility trial design is planned. Forty CCI survivors will be randomized (1:1) to either the PS-PICS (peer support) intervention or usual care (control) group.
- Detailed Description
Randomized participants will complete 4 study assessments: 1) baseline data at hospital discharge; 2) baseline data post-hospital discharge and before the start of the weekly peer support intervention; 3) post-intervention at the conclusion of the 90-day weekly peer support intervention; and 4) follow-up at 6-months post-hospital discharge. The weekly peer support intervention will be delivered by a small pool of critical illness survivor peers (mentors) recruited from the study site from previous research. Peer support mentors will be trained in peer support and MI, and will deliver 3 months of weekly MI interventions (phone-based) to CCI survivors randomized to the intervention group. Participants randomized to the usual care group will not receive the weekly peer support/MI intervention but will receive the usual discharge planning services currently provided at hospital discharge. Participants in both groups will be contacted by the research team for 4 telephone-based assessments. The design will allow us to test the feasibility and potential impact of the PS-PICS intervention on social relationship measures, depression and self-management. Data collection and analyses are guided by the Individual and Family Self-Management Theory. The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory illustrates the interaction of the process of self-management with risk and protective factors, and short-term and long-term outcomes.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- age18 years or older
- ICU length of stay 8 days or longer
- expected to survive hospitalization with a discharge destination to home within 28 days of hospital discharge
- diagnosed with 2 or more chronic conditions.
- death prior to hospital discharge
- enrollment in Hospice services at the time of hospital discharge
- non-communicative
- no access to telephone
- incarcerated
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Social Network Index 3 months post-intervention Social Network Index (SNI) to measure social relationships. The scale range is 0-12. The total score will be reported. The maximum total score is 12. Higher values represent a broader diversity of social networks and are classified as a better outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 3 months post-intervention Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to measure self-reported symptoms of depression The scale range is 0-60. The total score will be reported. The maximum total score is 60. Higher values represent self-reported symptoms of depression. Higher values represent a worse outcome.
Patient Activation Measure 3 months post-intervention Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Survey to measure self-reported active behavior in the self-management of chronic illness.
The scale range is 0-100. The total score will be reported. The maximum total score is 100. Higher values represent high levels of activation in self-management. Higher values represent a better outcome.Social Network Index 1-week Post-intervention Social Network Index (SNI) to measure social relationships. The scale range is 0-12. The total score will be reported. The maximum total score is 12. Higher values represent a broader diversity of social networks and are classified as a better outcome.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale 3 months post-intervention The Measure includes a scale. Please provide the following scale information:
Specify the full (unabbreviated) scale name and construct (i.e., indicate what the scale measures if not clear from name).
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Scale Include all scale ranges (i.e., minimum and maximum scores) required to interpret any values. For example, if the \*total\* score is reported, the \*total\* range should be provided. If \*subscale\* scores are reported, the range for each \*subscale\* should be provided.
The scale range is 0-65. The total score will be reported. For each scale range provided, specify which values are considered to be a better or worse outcome (e.g., Do higher values represent a better or worse outcome?).
The maximum total score is 65. Higher values represent higher levels of fatigue.
If subscales are combined to compute a total score, consider indicating how subscales are combined (summed, averaged, etc.).
N/AShort Form-36 (SF-36) 3 months post-intervention Short Form-36 (SF-36) or 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Instrument The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100.
Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability Sections: ∙ Vitality ∙ Physical functioning ∙ Bodily pain ∙ General health perceptions ∙ Physical role functi
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Baylor Scott & White Health
🇺🇸Temple, Texas, United States
Baylor Scott & White Health🇺🇸Temple, Texas, United StatesRichard HaoContact214-265-3683Richard.Hao@BSWHealth.org