A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Dose Regimens of Risankizumab Administered Subcutaneously in Japanese Subjects With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis or Erythrodermic Psoriasis
- Registration Number
- NCT03022045
- Lead Sponsor
- AbbVie
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of two different dose regimens of risankizumab for Japanese subjects with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) or erythrodermic psoriasis (EP).
- Detailed Description
Safety and efficacy data through 14 December 2017 are included in the interim analysis, which was conducted after all participants completed the Week 28 visit or discontinued from the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 18
For GPP
- Have a diagnosis of GPP for at least 60 days prior to informed consent based on the diagnostic criteria of the Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA). Subjects not fulfilling one of the diagnostic criteria i.e., "accompanying systemic symptoms including fever or malaise" at the time of screening can be entered.
- Subjects with an erythema area with pustules accounting for ≥ 10% of the body surface area (BSA), and with a severity assessment criteria score (JDA total score) specified by the JDA of less than 14.
- Must be candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy for GPP, as assessed by the investigator.
For EP
- Have a diagnosis of EP prior to informed consent.
- Subjects with an inflammatory erythema area accounting for ≥ 80% of the BSA at screening and at the time of the first administration of the study drug.
- Must be candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy for EP, as assessed by the investigator.
- Previous exposure to risankizumab.
- Currently enrolled in another investigational study or less than 30 days (from screening) since completing another investigational study (participation in observational studies is permitted).
For GPP
- Subjects with active ongoing inflammatory diseases other than GPP that might confound trial evaluations according to investigator's judgment.
For EP
- Subjects with active ongoing inflammatory diseases other than EP that might confound trial evaluations according to investigator's judgment.
- Subject diagnosed with medication-induced or medication-exacerbated EP.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Risankizumab 75 mg risankizumab Participants randomized to receive risankizumab 75 mg at Week 0, Week 4, and every 12 weeks up to Week 172. Risankizumab 150 mg risankizumab Participants randomized to receive risankizumab 150 mg at Week 0, Week 4, and every 12 weeks up to Week 172.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 16 Week 16 GPP Clinical Response defined as at least "Slightly Improved" in the overall improvement rating from baseline according to Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) total score for GPP. The JDA consists of an assessment of skin symptoms (area of skin with erythema, pustules, and edema) on a scale of 0 (none) to 9 (severe) and a systemic symptoms/assessment of test findings (fever, white blood count \[WBC\], serum C-reactive protein \[CRP\], and serum albumin) on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe). The JDA total score is the sum of the 2 assessments ranging from 0 (mild) to 17 (severe). The overall improvement rating ranges from Markedly improved (decreased by ≥ 3 points) to Worsened (increased by ≥ 1 point); Slightly improved represents no change in points and ≥ 20% and \< 30% reduction of erythema area with pustules compared to baseline, or clinically meaningful improvement in ≥1 other parameters of the severity assessment criteria. Nonresponder imputation (NRI) was used for missing data.
Percentage of Participants With Erythrodermic Psoriasis (EP) Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 16 Week 16 EP Clinical Response, defined as at least "Minimally Improved" in Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-GI) for EP. The CGI-GI is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-GI ratings are as follows: 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7 (very much worse). NRI was used for missing data.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With GPP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52 Week 52 PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 52 Week 52 PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With GPP Achieving GPP Clinical Response at Week 52 Week 52 GPP Clinical Response defined as at least "Slightly Improved" in the overall improvement rating from baseline according to JDA total score for GPP. The JDA consists of an assessment of skin symptoms (area of skin with erythema, pustules, and edema) on a scale of 0 (none) to 9 (severe) and a systemic symptoms/assessment of test findings (fever, WBC, serum CRP, and serum albumin) on a scale of 0 (none) to 8 (severe). The JDA total score is the sum of the 2 assessments ranging from 0 (mild) to 17 (severe). The overall improvement rating ranges from Markedly improved (decreased by ≥ 3 points) to Worsened (increased by ≥ 1 point); Slightly improved represents no change in points and ≥ 20% and \< 30% reduction of erythema area with pustules compared to baseline, or clinically meaningful improvement in ≥1 other parameters of the severity assessment criteria.
Percentage of Participants With EP Achieving EP Clinical Response at Week 52 Week 52 EP Clinical Response, defined as at least "Minimally Improved" in CGI-GI for EP. The CGI-GI is a global assessment by the Investigator of the change in clinical status since the start of treatment. The CGI-GI ratings are as follows: 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7 (very much worse).
Percentage of Participants With GPP Achieving 90% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI90) at Week 16 Week 16 PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100.
Percentage of Participants With EP Achieving PASI90 at Week 16 Week 16 PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The severity of each sign was assessed using a 5-point scale, where 0=no symptoms, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72, where 0 indicates no psoriasis and 72 indicates very severe psoriasis. PASI90 is defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI score compared with the Baseline PASI score. The percent reduction in score is calculated as (PASI score at Baseline - score at follow-up visit) / PASI score at Baseline \* 100. NRI was used for missing data.
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Takagi Dermatological Clinic
🇯🇵Obihiro, Hokkaido, Japan
Kansai Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Hirakata-shi, Osaka, Japan
Tokyo Medical University Hosp
🇯🇵Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
The University of Tokyo Hosp
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan
Nagoya City University Hospital
🇯🇵Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan
Shizuoka General Hospital
🇯🇵静岡市, Shizuoka, Japan
Juntendo Univ Urayasu Hosp
🇯🇵Urayasu Shi, Chiba, Japan
Mie University Hospital
🇯🇵Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
Fukuoka University Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka, Japan