MedPath

Evaluation of stability of two types of dental implants placed for the management of edentulous space in healthy and diabetic individuals

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge,
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/07/055458
Lead Sponsor
Geetha Arul Mohan
Brief Summary

Implants are  a preferred choice in the treatment of edentulism. There are various factors including implant surface characteristics and wettability which decide successful osseointegration. Common problems faced by patients during conventional implant treatment includes long waiting time for successful osseointegration usually 3-4 months, which is further delayed in diabetics( upto 6 months). Even though immediate loading is practiced, uncertainties due to lack of biological osseointegration prevails,  which posses unique challenges for the clinicians especially in medically compromised individuals with diabetes mellitus. Hence  there is always a quest for new implant designs and superior surface characteristics for shortened osseointegration time  and to reduce the overall treatment duration with special emphasis for diabetic patients. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a predictable non invasive tool, for evaluating the primary and secondary stability in numerous study.

a.     Traditional protocols propose that the implant should receive no loading during the osseointegration period usually 3-4 months in healthy individuals which is further higher in diabetics resulting in longer waiting period for the patients without teeth and compromised overall quality of life.

b.     A successful osseointegration is based on many factors that influence the formation and maintenance of bone at the implant surface such as the implant micro and macro surface characteristics, bone quality, primary stability, absence of micro motion, absence of infection during healing, aseptic surgical protocol and patient’s systemic conditions.

c.     Presently various implants are available with superior surface modifications like SLA active and trabecular tantalum implants. These implant surfaces have shown faster osseointegration.

d.     The trabecular implants, With a high coefficient of friction (0.98), it provides excellent initial scratch fit. Unlike coatings and other surfaces, *it* has up to**80% porosity**, enhancing the potential for **bone ingrowth and soft tissue vascularization**. With its nano-textured struct architecture, **Trabecular implants are similar to cancellous bone in structure**, **function, and physiology**. The Structure supports bone integration, bone remodeling and vascularization. These properties enhances the rate of osseointegration, thus reducing the overall treatment duration.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria for diabetic individuals: 1.diabetic patients with HbA1C: 6.1-8 [Group III and group IV] 2.Patients who are between 18-60 years of age 3.All sites had to be healed sites, that is at least 6 months of post extraction healing was required 4.Mandibular edentulous sites Inclusion criteria for healthy individuals: 1.Non diabetic patients with HbA1C- less than 6.1 [Group I and group II] 2.Patients who are between 18-60 years of age 3.All sites had to be healed sites, that is at least 6 months of post extraction healing was required 4.Mandibular edentulous sites.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria for diabetic individuals: 1.HbA1C levels exceeding 8 are excluded 2.History of oral /intravenous bisphosphonate use for >3 years 3.Smokers 4.Pregnancy or lactation 5.Known allergy to any material or medication used in the study 6.Any Previous History of head and neck radiation therapy 7.Chemotherapy in the last 12 months 8.Severe psychologic problems 9.Patient not willing to sign the consent approved by the Human Studies Committee 10.Debilitating systemic diseases or conditions that have a clinically significant effect on wound healing Exclusion criteria for healthy individuals: 1.HbA1C levels exceeding 6.1 are excluded[Group I and group II] 2.History of oral /intravenous bisphosphonate use for >3 years 3.Smokers 4.Pregnancy or lactation 5.Known allergy to any material or medication used in the study 6.Any Previous History of head and neck radiation therapy 7.Chemotherapy in the last 12 months 8.Severe psychologic problems 9.Patient not willing to sign the consent approved by the Human Studies Committee 10.Debilitating systemic diseases or conditions that have a clinically significant effect on wound.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of secondary stability using Resonance frequency analyser in healthy and diabetic individualssubjects will be followed at baseline, 2 and 4 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Evaluation of Primary stability and Crestal bone levels in healthy and diabetic individualssubjects will be followed at baseline, 2 and 4 months

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

SRM Dental college

🇮🇳

Chennai, TAMIL NADU, India

SRM Dental college
🇮🇳Chennai, TAMIL NADU, India
Geetha Arul Mohan
Principal investigator
9943320006
mail2algeetha@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.