跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03071367
NCT03071367已完成不适用

Title: A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical Learning for Airway Management in Medical Students: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota0 个研究点目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2012年8月20日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
102
主要终点
Airway management score

研究概览

简要总结

Multiple studies have shown clinical simulation benefits over classical learning method. Research on simulation of airway management has focused on endotracheal intubation training, while research on ventilation via facemask is scant. The investigators compared both learning methods regarding the acquirement of basic skills for airway management by medical students. Students in the clinical simulation group received a 3-hour training on airway management on the first day of their 28-day anesthesia rotation, while classical learning did not. On the last day of rotation, participants were evaluated based on a validated instrument of scores. Primary outcome was airway management scores. Secondary outcomes were rate of success of intubation and incidence of complications.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Last year medical students at Universidad de los Andes
  • Over 18 year old

排除标准

  • Previous elective anesthesia rotation
  • Motor deficit affecting the upper limbs

结局指标

主要结局

Airway management score

时间窗: 28 days

次要结局

  • Incidence of complications(28 days)
  • Successful intubation rate(28 days)

研究者

发起方
Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Leopoldo Ferrer

Anesthesiologist

Fundación Santa Fe de Bogota

相似试验

A Comparison of Clinical Simulation and Classical... | 临床试验