Comparison Between Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy and Haemorrhoidal Dearterialisation With Anopexy
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Third Degree Hemorrhoids
- Interventions
- Procedure: HemorrhoidectomyProcedure: Hemorrhoidal dearterialization
- Registration Number
- NCT01263431
- Lead Sponsor
- Scientific Institute San Raffaele
- Brief Summary
Aim of the study is to compare short term results of 2 surgical treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease, namely: pain and postoperative morbidity,complications and effectiveness within 30 days, re-starting daily and working activity, patients' satisfaction
- Detailed Description
Excisional haemorrhoidectomy is burdened by severe postoperative pain. For this reason less painful treatments have been developed, such as Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and stapled anopexy. Both techniques seem to be safe, causing little postoperative pain. A combination of the two techniques could possibly treat both bleeding and prolapse with minimal discomfort
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients aged 18-80, candidate to surgery for 3rd degree hemorrhoids
Exclusion Criteria
- Previous anal surgery or pelvic radiotherapy
- Fecal incontinence or obstructed defecation
- IBD, IBS
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hemorrhoidectomy Hemorrhoidectomy Excision of hemorrhoid cushions Hemorrhoidal dearterialization Hemorrhoidal dearterialization Ligation of therminbal branches oh hemorrhoid arteries
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative pain 1 week
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method postoperative morbidity 30 days Relapse 24 months resumption of working activity 30 days patient's satisfaction 30 days
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
San Raffaele Scientific Institute
🇮🇹Milano, Italy