MedPath

Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Colorectal Carcinoma
Interventions
Device: Artificial Intelligence
Device: Mucosal Exposure Device
Registration Number
NCT06621225
Lead Sponsor
Pankaj Patel
Brief Summary

N = 264 patients (50% female) aged 75 years and above undergoing colonoscopy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned into one of the three intervention groups: the primary intervention arm (CADe in combination with the MED), the second group with MED alone, and the control group with WLE. All detected lesions were removed and sent to histopathology for diagnosis. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate. Secondary outcomes were adenoma detection in the left colon in our cohort of patients.

Detailed Description

264 patients, with an equal gender distribution (50% female), aged 75 years and above, undergoing screening and diagnostic colonoscopy at The Surgery and Endoscopy Center of Sebring, Sebring, Florida, were enrolled in this study. The eligibility criteria for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing AI and mucosal exposure devices together, mucosal exposure devices alone, and white light endoscopy in patients 75 years and older could be structured as follows.

Patients were randomly allocated into one of three study groups: the primary intervention arm, where colonoscopy was performed using the CADe in combination with the MED; the second group underwent colonoscopy solely with the MED, while the control group underwent colonoscopy solely with the WLE. We used a Convolutional Neural Network-based CADe system, GI Genius, acquired for licensed use from Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN. The MED employed was the EndoCuff Vision (ECV) developed by Olympus America, Center Valley, PA, which constitutes part of the standard equipment available. All detected lesions were identified and excised throughout the colonoscopy procedures, and specimens were promptly sent for histopathological analysis.

The primary outcome of interest was adenoma detection rate (ADR), defined as the percentage of patients in whom at least one histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma was identified during colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included ADR in the left colon in our cohort of patients.

This study was conducted according to accepted ethical principles and approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of "The Surgery and Endoscopy Center of Sebring.\" Informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment, and measures were taken to ensure patient confidentiality and data protection throughout the study period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
264
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Primary Intervention ArmArtificial IntelligenceIn this arm, colonoscopy was performed using Computer Aided detection in combination with a Mucosal Exposure Device, which is FDA approved.
Primary Intervention ArmMucosal Exposure DeviceIn this arm, colonoscopy was performed using Computer Aided detection in combination with a Mucosal Exposure Device, which is FDA approved.
Secondary Intervention ArmMucosal Exposure DeviceIn this arm, participants underwent colonoscopy solely with an FDA approved Mucosal Exposure Device
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary Outcome Measure181 days

The primary outcome of interest was adenoma detection rate (ADR), defined as the percentage of patients in whom at least one histologically proven adenoma or carcinoma was identified during colonoscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Secondary Outcome Measure181 days

Secondary outcomes included Adenoam Detection Rate in the left colon in our cohort of patients.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The Surgery and Endoscopy Center of Sebring

🇺🇸

Sebring, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath