Supporting early recognition of clinical deterioration for Mobile Vital signs monitoring of high-risk surgical patients
- Conditions
- Pre- en postoperatieve complicaties bij hoog-risico chirurgie: complicationsclinical deterioration10017998
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON50879
- Lead Sponsor
- Ziekenhuisgroep Twente
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 80
The study population includes two patient groups:
1. Patients aged (18 years and older) undergoing elective surgery for resection
of malignant
tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract (upper GI patients)
2. Patients aged (70 years and older) undergoing surgery for a hip fracture and
admitted to the
hospital for pre- or postoperative care (hip fracture patients)
1. Contraindications for use of vital sign sensor patch (i.e. skin allergy,
implanted medical devices)
2. Contact isolation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The study will result in the development of a model for prediction of<br /><br>deterioration requiring escalation of care. The model performance will be<br /><br>assessed in terms of sensitivity and false discovery rate for prediction of<br /><br>deterioration requiring escalation of care within 24 hours, and compared with<br /><br>the currently used Modified Early Warning Score. </p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The study will result in:<br /><br>- Insight in patterns of deterioration, which will be described as<br /><br>characteristics (slopes, absolute values, ratio*s, etc.) observed in vital sign<br /><br>and routine clinical measurements<br /><br><br /><br>- Insight in methods that can support personalized detection of patters of<br /><br>deterioration<br /><br>- Insight in the potential clinical value of models for prediction of<br /><br>deterioration, which will assessed using the time between prediction of<br /><br>deterioration and current clinical response and compared with the currently<br /><br>used Modified Early Warning Score. </p><br>