MedPath

Immune Thrombocytopenia Management in Adults

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Immune Thrombocytopenia Purpura
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT05861297
Lead Sponsor
Nahda University
Brief Summary

Immune thrombocytopenia treatment has evolved recently. However, none of treatments have only benefits without drawbacks. This study compares the clinical outcomes and adverse drug patterns of different treatment options. Medications which will be assessed during the current study are High Dose-dexamethasone (HD-DXM) (control group), Prednisolone + Azathioprine, Rituximab, Eltrombopag, and Romiplostim.

Detailed Description

A prospective controlled randomized study was conducted on primary Immune thrombocytopenia patients. The study's main objective is to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events profile of the different therapeutic approaches during Immune thrombocytopenia. Upon the confirmation of the Immune thrombocytopenia diagnosis, all patients immediately initiated the High Dose-dexamethasone as a frontline therapy for Immune thrombocytopenia with a dose of 40 mg/m2 daily for 4 days/week in the first month for one cycle. Then, the recruited patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria are randomly assigned into one of five groups. Among these patients, the control group received IV pulse (HD-DXM) therapy with 40 mg/m2 daily for 4 successive days in a 28-day cycle to complete the six cycles. The Prednisolone + Azathioprine group received 20 mg of Prednisolone three times daily and 1 mg/kg of oral Azathioprine once daily for two weeks, then tapering the Prednisolone dose through the subsequent weeks (6 weeks). While continuing treatment with Azathioprine for a total of six months. The Rituximab group received 500 mg/m2 intravenously of Rituximab once weekly for one month. The Eltrombopag group received 50 mg of Eltrombopag four hours before or after meals as oral daily doses for 6 months. The Romiplostim group received 3μg/kg sub-cutaneous injection of Romiplostim once a week for 6 months. The first evaluation date of confirmed ITP diagnosis was well-defined as the first index date (baseline). After that, every patient visited the investigational site as the protocol prescribes once weekly to assess and adjust the doses of study medications. The outcome measures were judged at baseline, at the end of treatment (6 months), and after an additional 6-month free treatment period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
467
Inclusion Criteria
  • Inclusion criteria were adult patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with primary ITP after excluding secondary causes and with an initial PLTs count of less than 30 ×109/L or with hemorrhage manifestations.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with a confirmed secondary ITP diagnoses such as (chemicals induced, systemic lupus erythematosus, immune thyroid diseases, a lymphoproliferative disease, or chronic infection, such as Helicobacter pylori, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV); with cardiac, renal, or liver disease; who had received NSAIDs or anti-platelets within one month before the initiation of the enrollment were excluded from the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupDexamethasoneThe first (control )group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received IV pulse (High Dose-Dexamethasone) therapy
The RTX groupRituximabThe third group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Prednisolone -Azathioprine therapy
The ELTRO groupEltrombopagThe fourth group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received E therapy
The ROMP groupRomiplostimThe fifth group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Romiplostim therapy
PSL - AZA groupPrednisolone and AzathioprineThe second group includes patients with confirmed diagnosed who received Prednisolone -Azathioprine therapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
total patients who achieved sustained and overall response18 months

The primary outcomes were the total percentage of patients achieving a sustained response (SR) till the end of the study, complete response (CR), and partial response (PR). CR was characterized by the absence of bleeding and an increase in the platelet count to above 100×109/L after one month of the treatment. SR was defined as achieving CR or partial response (PR) until the end of the study with a 2-fold upsurge from starting point \[20, 21\]. PR was represented as PLTs count ≥ 30×109/L after one month following therapy, and no response (NR) was defined as platelets \< 30×109/L or bleeding

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
number of patients relapsed and adverse events18 months

The secondary outcome measures were a number of patients relapsed and adverse events (AEs). Relapse was pointed out as PLTs count below 30×109/L or bleeding episodes owing to thrombocytopenia afterward achieving the CR

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

EL-Kasr elineiy

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath