Implementing a Psychosocial Intervention to Reduce Self-stigma and Improve Quality of Life Among Mental Health Outpatients in Chile: a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 76
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Self-stigma
研究概览
简要总结
The principal objective of this pilot trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a psychosocial intervention to reduce self-stigma and improve treatment adherence and quality of life among people with a severe mental illness who attend to Community Mental Health Centers in Chile. The intervention is based on recovery and narrative therapy and considers 10 group sessions, mainly with patients, but also integrating relatives and professionals in some of the activities.
详细描述
It has been shown that stigma is one of the main barriers faced by individuals with mental illness, negatively impacting their service use and continuity of treatment. Additionally, given its impact on self-esteem, personal empowerment, and social inclusion, stigma greatly affects the quality of life of this population.
Consequently, a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two arms (intervention group vs. control group) was designed and implemented. Participants were identified and recruited from two community mental health centers located in Central Chile. The intervention group, in addition to usual care, received a psychosocial intervention based on narrative therapy, recovery and psychoeducation which was specially tailored for this population by the authors.
The sample corresponds to 76 individuals with a severe mental illness (ICD-10), currently treated in the two participating Community Mental Health Centers (COSAM). The category "severe mental illness" includes patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and severe depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms. Finally, those two clinics were chosen by convenience in order to facilitate the implementation of this study.
Before and after the intervention, the participants' self-stigma (Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness, ISMI), treatment adherence (weeks in treatment), and quality of life (Sevilla Quality of Life Scale) were measured. In addition, the following control variables were also evaluated, due to their influence on the principal outcomes: 1) sociodemographic information, 2) symptom presence and severity (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, PANSS), and 3) alcohol consumption (The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, AUDIT).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 45 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •People with diagnosis of severe mental illness, including the following ICD-10 disorders: schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms.
- •No longer than 5 years since the diagnosis since the first visit to a mental health clinic.
排除标准
- •Expressing active suicidal ideation.
- •Having substance abuse or dependence alone (may have psychotic symptoms but does not meet criteria for diagnoses included).
- •Presenting cognitive or other sensorial impairment which is likely to preclude reliable assessment via our interview procedures
结局指标
主要结局
Self-stigma
时间窗: Baseline (month 6); First follow-up assessment (change from Baseline ISMI scores at month 10); Second follow-up assessment (change from Baseline and 1st follow-up ISMI scores at month 14)
Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI) (Rishter et al., 2003). A Chilean version of this instrument was used during the study.
次要结局
- Quality of Life(Baseline (month 6); First follow-up assessment (change from Baseline CSCV scores at month 10); Second follow-up assessment (change from Baseline and 1st follow-up CSCV scores at month 14))
- Psychopathology(Baseline (month 6); First follow-up assessment (chance from Baseline PANSS scores at month 10); Second follow-up assessment (change from Baseline and 1st follow-up PANSS scores at month 14))
- Treatment adherence(Baseline (month 6); First follow-up assessment (change from Treatment Adherence Baseline at month 10); Second follow-up assessment (change from Treatment Adherence Baseline and 1st follow-up at month 14))
研究者
Franco Mascayano
BA MPH
University of Chile