Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for Dysphagia in Neonates
- Conditions
- Dysphagia
- Interventions
- Device: VitalStimDevice: Sham VitalStim
- Registration Number
- NCT02007759
- Lead Sponsor
- Sanford Health
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) will provide a more efficient method of treating neonates with dysfunctional oral feeding such as dysphagia. This study will attempt to determine if NMES applied to neonates at 36-42 weeks post-conception age (PCA) will decrease the need for nasogastric tubes (NG) and gastrostomy tubes (G-TUBE). Increase the rate at which these neonates complete full oral feeds, improve their swallowing skills, increase oral intake of calories, and gain weight.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- Male or female.
- Meet diagnostic criteria for dysphagia symptoms using the NOMAS and a VFSS.
- Infants with intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and hypoxic events can be included.
- Infants taking less than 5-10% of target volume by mouth between the ages of 36-42 weeks PCA.
- Multiple swallows to clear bolus following suck that includes a desaturation <80% and bradycardia <80 bpm.
- Apnea spells during feeds.
- Aspiration or penetration by VFSS
- Known neurologic or neurodegenerative disorders.
- Chromosomal anomalies and syndromes.
- Cleft lip or palate.
- Birth defects.
- Unresolved cutaneous rash at the area of electrode placement.
- Medical condition that is a contraindication to NMES.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VitalStim VitalStim This group will be assigned to the active VitalStim unit. Sham VitalStim Sham VitalStim This group will be assigned to the sham VitalStim unit.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Increased percent of subjects towards achieving full oral feedings earlier in the subject's dysphagia treatment. Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks Earlier NG tube removal for the treatment group compared to the control group. Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks Increase the amount of formula volume taken at feedings from beginning to end of study. 2 weeks Reduction in G-tube rate insertions for the treatment grouped compared to the sham group. Over the course of the treatment time frame to discharge, 2 weeks to 8 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Decrease inpatient length of stay. 4 weeks Decrease spells with oral feeds over the course of the study. 2 weeks Allow for healthy weight gain via improved feedings. 2 weeks Increase the caloric intake orally. 2 weeks Decrease the oxygen requirement before and after study. 2 weeks Improve swallowing skills as measured by videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and the video swallow assessment worksheet. 2 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sanford USD Medical Center
🇺🇸Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States