MedPath

Classification and Prediction of Difficult Awake Tracheal Intubation With Flexible Bronchoscopes

Recruiting
Conditions
Anesthesia
Airway Management
Intubation, Intratracheal
Bronchoscopy
Endoscopes
Registration Number
NCT06953414
Lead Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brief Summary

Airway management problems are key drivers for anesthesia-related adverse events. Awake tracheal intubation using flexible bronchoscopes with preserved spontaneous breathing (ATI:FB) is a recommended technique to manage difficult tracheal intubation in anesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine. However, a prospective developed classification for this type of airway management is lacking. Due to the absence of a specifically tailored, validated classification for awake intubation with flexible bronchoscopes, many airway operators and institutions use classification tools that were originally developed for direct laryngoscopy, such as the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score or Cormack-Lehane classification, although their diagnostic performance for the classification of ATI:FB is unknown. This prospective model development and validation study aims to develop two multivariable prediction models: a diagnostic prediction model to classify difficult ATI:FB after ATI:FB has been performed and a second prognostic prediction model to predict the risk for difficult ATI:FB before ATI:FB is performed. An additional aim is to develop a machine learning algorithm to evaluate ATI:FB.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
313
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with an anticipated difficult airways scheduled for ATI:FB
  • Consent by the patient
  • Minimum 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients not scheduled for ATI:FB
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Consent not given by the patient

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difficult awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation1 hour

Difficult airway alert issued by the airway operator following ATI:FB

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
First attempt success1 hour

Number of participants with successful ATI:FB with only one attempt

Number of bronchoscopy attempts1 hour

Observed during airway management

Number of intubation attempts1 hour

Observed during airway management

Successful ATI:FB1 hour

Number of participants with successful ATI:FB

Successful bronchoscopy1 hour

Number of participants with successful bronchoscopy

Successful tube placement1 hour

Number of participants with successful tracheal tube placement

Coversion to another type of airway management1 hour

Observed during airway management

Conversion from transnasal to transoral bronchoscopy or vice versa1 hour

Observed during airway management

Percentage of glottic opening1 hour

Grading of the best view obtained during laryngoscopy (%)

Glottic view1 hour

Grading of the best view obtained using landmarks (6-stages)

Time to best glottic view1 hour

Recorded during airway management (seconds)

Time to intubation1 hour

Recorded during airway management (seconds)

Lowest oxygen saturation1 hour

Measured during airway management (%)

Endtidal CO21 hour

First value measured after intubation (mmHg)

Airway obstructions requiring external manipulation1 hour

Observed during airway management

Hypoxia1 hour

Observed during airway management

Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypotension/bradycardia)1 hour

Relevant hypotension or bradycardia observed during airway management

Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypertension, tachycardia)1 hour

Relevant hypertension or tachycardia observed during airway management

Additional manouvers and adjuncts used1 hour

Observed during airway management

Patient discomfort during ATI:FB1 hour

Observed during airway management

Airway-related complications1 hour

Observed during airway management

Recommendation for future airway management1 hour

Recommendation documented by the airway operator after airway management

Richmond agitation-sedation Scale1 hour

Observed during airway management (scale form -4 to 5 points; lower values indicate deeper sedation)

Subjective rating of difficulty of sedation, topicalisation, bronchoscopy and tube placement1 hour

Rating of the airway operator (visual analog scales \[0-100\]; lower values indicate better conditions)

Preparation time1 hour

Recorded during airway management

Anaesthesia alert card issued1 hour

Anaesthesia alert card issued by the airway operator

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Martin Petzoldt, MD
Contact
04915222815932
m.petzoldt@uke.de
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath