Classification and Prediction of Difficult Awake Tracheal Intubation With Flexible Bronchoscopes
- Conditions
- AnesthesiaAirway ManagementIntubation, IntratrachealBronchoscopyEndoscopes
- Registration Number
- NCT06953414
- Lead Sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Brief Summary
Airway management problems are key drivers for anesthesia-related adverse events. Awake tracheal intubation using flexible bronchoscopes with preserved spontaneous breathing (ATI:FB) is a recommended technique to manage difficult tracheal intubation in anesthesia, intensive care and emergency medicine. However, a prospective developed classification for this type of airway management is lacking. Due to the absence of a specifically tailored, validated classification for awake intubation with flexible bronchoscopes, many airway operators and institutions use classification tools that were originally developed for direct laryngoscopy, such as the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score or Cormack-Lehane classification, although their diagnostic performance for the classification of ATI:FB is unknown. This prospective model development and validation study aims to develop two multivariable prediction models: a diagnostic prediction model to classify difficult ATI:FB after ATI:FB has been performed and a second prognostic prediction model to predict the risk for difficult ATI:FB before ATI:FB is performed. An additional aim is to develop a machine learning algorithm to evaluate ATI:FB.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 313
- Patients with an anticipated difficult airways scheduled for ATI:FB
- Consent by the patient
- Minimum 18 years of age
- Patients not scheduled for ATI:FB
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
- Consent not given by the patient
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difficult awake flexible bronchoscopic intubation 1 hour Difficult airway alert issued by the airway operator following ATI:FB
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First attempt success 1 hour Number of participants with successful ATI:FB with only one attempt
Number of bronchoscopy attempts 1 hour Observed during airway management
Number of intubation attempts 1 hour Observed during airway management
Successful ATI:FB 1 hour Number of participants with successful ATI:FB
Successful bronchoscopy 1 hour Number of participants with successful bronchoscopy
Successful tube placement 1 hour Number of participants with successful tracheal tube placement
Coversion to another type of airway management 1 hour Observed during airway management
Conversion from transnasal to transoral bronchoscopy or vice versa 1 hour Observed during airway management
Percentage of glottic opening 1 hour Grading of the best view obtained during laryngoscopy (%)
Glottic view 1 hour Grading of the best view obtained using landmarks (6-stages)
Time to best glottic view 1 hour Recorded during airway management (seconds)
Time to intubation 1 hour Recorded during airway management (seconds)
Lowest oxygen saturation 1 hour Measured during airway management (%)
Endtidal CO2 1 hour First value measured after intubation (mmHg)
Airway obstructions requiring external manipulation 1 hour Observed during airway management
Hypoxia 1 hour Observed during airway management
Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypotension/bradycardia) 1 hour Relevant hypotension or bradycardia observed during airway management
Cardiovascular event requiring intervention (hypertension, tachycardia) 1 hour Relevant hypertension or tachycardia observed during airway management
Additional manouvers and adjuncts used 1 hour Observed during airway management
Patient discomfort during ATI:FB 1 hour Observed during airway management
Airway-related complications 1 hour Observed during airway management
Recommendation for future airway management 1 hour Recommendation documented by the airway operator after airway management
Richmond agitation-sedation Scale 1 hour Observed during airway management (scale form -4 to 5 points; lower values indicate deeper sedation)
Subjective rating of difficulty of sedation, topicalisation, bronchoscopy and tube placement 1 hour Rating of the airway operator (visual analog scales \[0-100\]; lower values indicate better conditions)
Preparation time 1 hour Recorded during airway management
Anaesthesia alert card issued 1 hour Anaesthesia alert card issued by the airway operator
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf🇩🇪Hamburg, GermanyMartin Petzoldt, MDContact04915222815932m.petzoldt@uke.de