Regional Citrate Anticoagulation for RRT During V-V ECMO
- Conditions
- ARDS, HumanAcute Kidney Injury
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05148026
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Milano Bicocca
- Brief Summary
Anticoagulation is an essential component of all extracorporeal therapies. Currently locoregional citrate anticoagulation is the recommended technique for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
However, low clearance of citrate restricts its use to blood flow up to 150 mL/min, preventing its use in ECMO.
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is commonly provided to ECMO patients with AKI. In presence of systemic heparinization for ECMO, additional anticoagulation for the CRRT circuit (i.e. RCA) is usually not employed.
Nevertheless, thrombosis occurs more frequently in the CRRT circuit than the oxygenator because of the slower blood flow.
The aim of this prospective, cross-over study is to assess, in patients undergoing CRRT during veno-venous ECMO (vv-ECMO), the efficacy and safety of adding regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) for CRRT circuit anticoagulation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Patients admitted in ICU
- V-V ECMO support for acute respiratory failure
- CRRT therapy for acute kidney injury
- Pregnancy
- Pre-existing coagulation disorders
- Contraindication to heparin or citrate anticoagulation
- Moribund patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Anticoagulation sequence 1 (UFH+ RCA) Unfractionated heparin first UFH+ RCA first Anticoagulation sequence 2 (UFH) Unfractionated heparin + RCA first UFH first
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of CRRT circuit clotting according to anticoagulation regimen According to the manufacturer recommendation elective RRT circuit replacement will be performed after 72 hours of circuit life. Rate of clotting in the intervention group (RCA+UFH) vs controls (UFH). I.e. : did the circuit clot in its 72h life?
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method CRRT circuit "survival" analysis According to the manufacturer recommendation elective RRT circuit replacement will be performed after 72 hours of circuit life. "Circuit life" of RRT circuits in the intervention group (RCA+UFH) vs controls (UFH), comparison between groups will be performed as time to event(clotting) by log-rank test and described by the kaplan meier approach. Circuit replacement for other reasons (e.g. transfer to radiology to undergo a CT scan) will be right censored
Comparison of platelets count, D-dimers, fibrinogen 72 hours for each circuit Comparison of lab values of blood sampled during intervention (RCA+UFH) vs control (UFH). Values will be compared as absolute value and as a difference compared to each circuit baseline
Incidence of citrate anticoagulation side-effects 72 hours for each circuit Total to ionized calcium ratio (marker of citrate accumulation), rate of hypersodiemia and alkalosis will be compared between intervention (RCA+UFH) and control (UFH)
To evaluate the anticoagulation effects of UFH and RCA 72 hours for each circuit TEG analysis of blood samples with UFH vs UFH+RCA effect will be compared. Specifically, TEG R-time will be compared in blood sampled from circuit anti-coagulated with RCA+UFH vs UFH only
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
ASST MONZA-Rianimazione Generale
🇮🇹Monza, Italy