MedPath

Clinical Performance of Hydrogel vs. Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Myopia
Interventions
Device: omafilcon A
Device: ocufilcon D
Device: methafilcon A
Registration Number
NCT02131402
Lead Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
Brief Summary

The aim of this non-dispensing fitting study is to evaluate the subjective comfort, lens handling, lens fitting characteristics and visual acuity of different hydrogel lens designs versus silicone hydrogel lenses

Detailed Description

This is a 60-subject, double masked, randomized, contra lateral, non-dispensing fitting trial comparing different lens materials (hydrogel vs silicone hydrogel). It is anticipated that this study will involve 2 visits, for each lens pair, as follows: Visits: V1 (lens dispensing), V2 (1 hour post lens settling). Each subject will be randomized to wear the test and control lenses in a series of three short fitting comparisons.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft CL (Contact Lens) wearer
  • Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 10.00 (inclusive)
  • Has a spectacle cylinder up to 0.75D (Diopter) in each eye.
  • Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
  • Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has never worn contact lenses before.

  • Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.

  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)

  • Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -10.00D

  • Has a spectacle cylinder ≥1.00D of cylinder in either eye.

  • Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.

  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities.

  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.

  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:

    • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
    • Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
    • Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
    • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
    • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
    • Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
    • History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
    • Poor personal hygiene
  • Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)

  • Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.

  • Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.

  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.

  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
enfilcon A / omafilcon Aomafilcon AParticipants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.
enfilcon A / ocufilcon Docufilcon DParticipants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.
enfilcon A / methafilcon Amethafilcon AParticipants wear a pair of lenses, with a test lens in one eye and a control lens in the contra lateral eye. After approximately 1 hour of lens wear, the lenses will be removed and the next pair will be inserted. This will be repeated for a total of three pairs of lenses.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Participant Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon ABaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning, 100=extreme stinging).

Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon DBaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #2 (at insertion). Rated by Questionnaire (0-100,0=Can't be worn and causes pain, 100=can't feel).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #1. Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0= Can't be worn and causes pain, 100= can't feel).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hours post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=Can't be worn and causes pain 100= can't feel).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaires (0-100 0=Can't be worn and causes pain, 100= can't feel).

Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon ABaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Methafilcon A, Strong Methafilcon A).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Ocufilcon D, Strong Ocufilcon D).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. Slit lamp (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. Slit lamp. (0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs Pair #1. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling (1 hour) of lens wear for Pair #1. Rated by subjects preference for test lens or control lens (Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Omafilcon A, Strong Omafilcon A).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Methafilcon A, Strong Methafilcon A).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Post-blink Movement, and Primary Gaze Lag - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. (0-4, 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 1=Minimal, but acceptable movement, 2=Optimal movement, 3=Moderate, but acceptable movement, 4=Excessive, unacceptable movement)

Participant Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon DBaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #2 at baseline. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning 100=extreme stinging)

Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0= no sensation of stinging/burning,100= extreme stinging).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2, (0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Tightness Push-up Test - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3. (Scale 0%-100%, 0%-100%, continuous scale where 100%=no movement, 50%=optimum, 0%=Falls from cornea without lid support)

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs- Pair #2. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0= no sensation of stinging/burning, 100= extreme stinging).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Visual acuity assessed after insertion of each study lens, prior to dispensing contralateral pairs- Pair #3. LogMAR Visual Acuity (VA) to nearest letter)

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #2. (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #3. Rated by questionnaires (0-100 0=Very difficult, 100= very easy).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #1 (1 hour). Rated by questionnaires (0= Very difficult 0-100, 100= very easy).

Participant's Subjective Rating for Lens Handling - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon D1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal for Pair #2 (1 hour). Rated by questionnaires (0=Very difficult 0-100, 100= very easy).

Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon ABaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens Pair #1 at (Baseline visit). Rated by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Omafilcon A, Strong Omafilcon A).

Participants Subjective Rating for Lens Comfort Preference - Enfilcon A / Ocufilcon DBaseline

Surveyed at insertion of each lens Pair #2 by questionnaire (4 possible ratings: Strong Enfilcon A, Slight Enfilcon A, No preference, Slight Ocufilcon D, Strong Ocufilcon D).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling of lens wear for Pair #1. (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable).

Eye Care Practitioner's Objective Assessment of Lens Fit, Centration - Enfilcon A / Methafilcon A1 hour post settling

Assessed after 1 hour post settling for Pair #3, (4 possible ratings: optimum, Decentration acceptable, Decentration unacceptable)

Participant's Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon ABaseline

Surveyed after insertion of each lens for Pair #1 at baseline visit. Rated by questionnaires (0-100, 0=no sensation of stinging/burning, 100= extreme stinging).

Participants Subjective Rating for Stinging/Burning - Enfilcon A / Omafilcon A1 hour post settling

Surveyed after 1 hour of lens wear for each lens at lens removal Pair #1. Rated by questionnaires (0-100,0=no sensation of stinging/burning 100=extreme stinging).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Optometry Research Group (GIO) Optics Department, University of Valencia

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath