MedPath

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of a New Contact Lens Disinfecting Solution in Gas Permeable Contact Lens Wearers

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Astigmatism
Myopia
Refractive Error
Hyperopia
Interventions
Device: FID 120947A contact lens disinfecting solution
Device: Boston Simplus multi-action solution
Device: Gas permeable contact lenses
Registration Number
NCT01912781
Lead Sponsor
Alcon Research
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is demonstrate substantial equivalence of an investigational contact lens disinfecting solution to a commercially available contact lens solution in gas permeable lens wearers.

Detailed Description

Subjects with normal eyes (other than correction for refractive error) successfully wearing silicone acrylate or fluoro silicone acrylate gas permeable contact lenses were randomized 2:1 to receive either the investigational or commercial contact lens solution for daily use throughout the study (90 days).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
112
Inclusion Criteria
  • Normal eyes (other than correction for visual acuity);
  • Successful history of gas permeable contact lens wear in both eyes in one of two brands: Boston XO or Boston II;
  • Best spectacle corrected distance visual acuity greater than or equal to 20/25 in each eye;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any ocular or systemic medical condition that may, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude safe administration of the investigational products or affect the results of this study;
  • Need to wear contact lenses on an extended wear basis (ie, overnight) during the study;
  • Use of a daily cleaner and/or an enzyme cleaner to care for lenses at least 7 days prior to Visit 1;
  • History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational products;
  • Use of all over-the-counter (OTC) or prescribed topical ocular medications within 7 days prior to Visit 1;
  • Moderate, severe, abnormal, or other ocular findings;
  • Current or history of ocular infection, severe inflammation, or disease within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Any systemic disease at Visit 1 (including allergies, respiratory infections or colds) that may affect the eye or be exacerbated by use of contact lenses or contact lens solutions;
  • Use of systemic medications that may contribute to adverse ocular effects unless on a stable dosing regimen;
  • Ocular surgery within the last 12 months;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
FID 120974AFID 120947A contact lens disinfecting solutionFID 120947A contact lens disinfecting solution used with gas permeable contact lenses (study lenses) on a daily basis for 90 days
Boston SimplusGas permeable contact lensesBoston Simplus multi-action solution used with gas permeable contact lenses (study lenses) on a daily basis for 90 days
FID 120974AGas permeable contact lensesFID 120947A contact lens disinfecting solution used with gas permeable contact lenses (study lenses) on a daily basis for 90 days
Boston SimplusBoston Simplus multi-action solutionBoston Simplus multi-action solution used with gas permeable contact lenses (study lenses) on a daily basis for 90 days
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Subjects With Film Deposits by TypeDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered: Type II = films or deposits visible only under special conditions, such as special illumination using an eyepiece of 7-10 times magnification, Type III = films or deposits readily visible on a dry lens under room lighting, with unaided eye, and Type IV = films or deposits obvious under room lighting, with unaided eye, when the lens is wet or dry. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Average Lens Wear TimeDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Subject recorded a response to the question, "Averaging over the last 3 days, how many hours per day did you wear your contact lenses?" Lens wear time was measured in hours.

Percentage of Subjects With Visibly Clean LensesDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. A lens was considered visibly clean if it had nondetectable films or deposits. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Average Residual Lens LysozymeDay 90/Early Exit

Worn study lenses were removed and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for residual lens lysozyme (protein). Values reported as lower than the limit of quantitation or none detected were imputed as 0.5 μg or 0 μg, respectively. A lower value indicates less lysozyme deposition. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Percentage of Subjects With Change From Baseline in Contact Lens-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CLCDVA) by Line ChangeBaseline (Day 0), Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Distance VA was assessed for each eye individually while reading a chart distant to the participant in dimmed room illumination. VA was measured using a Snellen chart, with 20/20 Snellen acuity considered normal distance-eyesight. A line increase indicates an improvement in VA. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Percentage of Subjects With Crystalline Deposits by TypeDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered: Type II = films or deposits visible only under special conditions, such as special illumination using an eyepiece of 7-10 times magnification, Type III = films or deposits readily visible on a dry lens under room lighting, with unaided eye, and Type IV = films or deposits obvious under room lighting, with unaided eye, when the lens is wet or dry. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Number of Unscheduled Lens Replacements by ReasonUp to Day 90

No lens replacements were planned during the study. Lenses could be replaced as needed due to loss, damage, or as deemed necessary by the Investigator. If it became necessary to replace a lens, the subject was examined at an unscheduled visit. The counts in the table represent the total number of unscheduled lenses replaced by reason for any eye, any subject.

Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, my Lenses Are Comfortable All Day."Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Lens comfort was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects.

Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, I Like the Way This Product Feels During Handling."Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Product handling was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects.

Crystalline Deposit Area CoveredDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. Values were reported as a percentage of lens area covered. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, at the End of the Lens Wearing Day my Vision is Clear."Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Clear vision was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects.

Film Deposit Area CoveredDay 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90

Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. Values were reported as a percentage of lens area covered. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath