MedPath

KTP Green Light Prostatectomy Compared With TUR-P in High Risk Patients

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
Interventions
Procedure: KTP laser
Procedure: TUR-P
Registration Number
NCT02075736
Lead Sponsor
University of Helsinki
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of Green Light PVP (Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate) compared to TUR-P in high risk patients

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Men with anticoagulant medication undergoing surgery for BPH
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous prostate surgery
  • Carcinoma of the prostate
  • Neurogenic bladder
  • Bladder carcinoma

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
KTP laserKTP laserdevice
TUR-PTUR-Pdevice
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Re-bleeding rate requiring hospitalizationtwo months postoperatively
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Length of catheterizationParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected maximum of one week
Residual urine0, 3, 6 and 12 months
Length of hospital stayParticipants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected maximum of one week
IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score)0, 3, 6 and 12 months

symptom score

Maximum flow rate (Qmax)0, 3, 6 and 12 months
DAN-PSS (Danish Prostate Symptom Score)0, 3, 6 and 12 months
IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire0,12 months
TRUS (transrectal ultrasound)0, 12 months
Perioperative bleedingTime of operation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Helsinki University Hospital

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath