KTP (Potassium-titanyl-phosphate) Laser Versus TUR-P (Transurethral Resection of Prostate)
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
- Interventions
- Device: Green light LaserDevice: Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
- Registration Number
- NCT02011308
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Helsinki
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of Green Light PVP (Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate) compared to TUR-P.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 217
Inclusion Criteria
- Men undergoing surgery for BPH
Exclusion Criteria
- Previous prostate surgery
- Carcinoma of the prostate
- Neurogenic bladder
- Bladder carcinoma
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description TURP Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Green Light Laser Green light Laser - Green Light Laser Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) - TURP Green light Laser Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) 12 months symptom
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Maximum flow rate (Qmax) 3, 6 and 12 months Length of hospital stay Postoperative recovery IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire) 12 months Erectile Dysfunction
DAN-PSS (Danish Prostate Symptom Score) 3, 6 and 12 months symptom
Perioperative bleeding Time of operation Length of catheterization Postoperative recovery Residual urine 3, 6 and 12 months TRUS (transrectal ultrasound) 12 months Measurement of prostate size
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Helsinki University Hospital
🇫🇮Helsinki, Finland