Randomized Trial of Fresh Frozen Plasma Versus Albumin in Acute Burn Resuscitation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 59
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Total volume of fluid administered in 24 hours in each group (FFP or albumin), measured as mL/kg/%TBSA burned.
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators propose a prospective randomized trial to study fresh frozen plasma (FFP) versus albumin to determine the optimal colloid in burn resuscitations. This work addresses both FY20 focus areas, prolonged field care (PFC) and en route care, along with mitigating secondary effects of acute intervention, such as prevention of over resuscitation. Future military conflicts anticipate more extensive burn and blast injuries, and delayed evacuation. Therefore, the direct comparison of colloids used in burn resuscitation is critical to advancing battlefield medicine. Specifically, this work will provide the foundation for the use of freeze-dried plasma (FDP) in burn care by medical responders in PFC and en route care scenarios. The investigators hypothesize that FFP administration, and later FDP, in burn resuscitation is as safe as albumin, and more efficacious, in both reducing the total volume of fluid required in acute burn resuscitation and correcting burn endotheliopathy.
详细描述
Specific Aim 1: The investigators will evaluate the total fluids administered in FFP (intervention) and albumin (control) groups. The investigators propose that the FFP group will require less total fluids administered.
Specific Aim 2:The investigators will determine overall complication rates (pulmonary complications, ARDS, ACS, over-resuscitation) in the FFP (intervention) and albumin (control) administration groups. The investigators propose FFP administration will reduce the frequency of these complications.
Specific Aim 3: The investigators will characterize the effects of FFP and albumin administration on endothelial dysfunction in major burns. We will measure glycocalyx degradation products (e.g. syndecan-1, glycosaminoglycans) in the serum. The investigators project FFP will mitigate GDP better than albumin.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 100 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •adult thermal injury patients aged 2:18 years old with burns ->20% TBSA seen at UCH Burn Center within 8 hours of burn injury
排除标准
- •Pregnant patients, prisoners, Jehovah's Witness/inability to receive human blood product/component therapy, electrical injury, chemical injury, friction/shear injury, anticipated death within 48 hours of admission, delayed intervention (>8 hours post burn), history of renal failure requiring dialysis, Stage IV or V chronic kidney disease, coagulopathy (admission INR >2.5), cirrhosis (Childs B,C), concomitant life threatening traumatic injuries, receiving blood product transfusion for another reason, inability to obtain consent from patient or legally authorized representative.
结局指标
主要结局
Total volume of fluid administered in 24 hours in each group (FFP or albumin), measured as mL/kg/%TBSA burned.
时间窗: 3 years
Total volume
次要结局
未报告次要终点