Evaluation of Use of Diagnostic AI for Lung Cancer in Practice
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Interventions
- Behavioral: AI-human interaction
- Registration Number
- NCT03780582
- Lead Sponsor
- Ensemble Group Holdings, LLC
- Brief Summary
This study investigates ways of improving radiologists performance of the classification of CT-scans as cancerous or non-cancerous. Participants interact with an AI to classify CT-scans under three different conditions.
- Detailed Description
The three conditions are as follows: "probabilistic classification", where the radiologist diagnoses scans using an AI cancer likelihood score; "classification plus detection", where the radiologist see detecting lung nodules in addition to the AI's probabilistic classification score before making her own examination of the CT-scan; and "classification with delayed detection", where the radiologist identifies regions of interest independently of the AI and then sees the AI's detected ROIs.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
- The participant performs radiology screenings professionally
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Probabilistic Classification AI-human interaction Radiologists see a "score" from 1-100 that represents the AI's prediction of whether the CT-scan comes from a patient with cancer or not before beginning their analysis of the scan. Classification Plus Detection AI-human interaction Radiologists see a "score" from 1-100 that represents the AI's prediction of whether the CT-scan comes from a patient with cancer or not before beginning their analysis of the scan. They also see ROIs identified by the AI that represent lung nodules. Classification With Delayed Detection AI-human interaction Radiologists see a "score" from 1-100 that represents the AI's prediction of whether the CT-scan comes from a patient with cancer or not before beginning their analysis of the scan. After identifying their own ROIs, the radiologist then can see ROIs identified by the AI that represent lung nodules before making final decisions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Classification accuracy up to 4 months after initiation of evaluation of the test set This compares radiologists' classifications with the ground truth in the tested cases.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method detection concordance up to 4 months after initiation of evaluation of the test set Evaluation of concordance between radiologists in the tested cases in detection of lung nodules \> 4 mm
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Hong Kong
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Hong Kong, Hong Kong