Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03849534
NCT03849534WithdrawnNot Applicable

Evaluation of Different Treatment Modalities in Children With Myalgia or Arthralgia in the Temporomandibular Region - a Randomized, Single-blinded, Controlled Non-inferiority Study

Karolinska Institutet2 sites in 1 country150 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Withdrawn
Enrollment
150
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Responders to treatment - median weekly pain intensity

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Children and adolescents are treated with routine treatment approaches for adults and one of the most commonly used treatments are occlusal appliances. The use of occlusal appliances in managing orofacial pain conditions is supported by evidence, but only for adults. However, the efficacy of the treatment approaches and any possible side-effects/impairment of mandibular growth are absent.

Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate the effectiveness and possible side-effects of different treatment modalities, such as an occlusal appliance, jaw exercises, NSAID for the conditions myalgia orarthralgia in the orofacial region in children with primary or mixed dentition.

Detailed Description

It is well known that the impact of pain in the orofacial region is not only the unpleasant sensory experience but also an emotional experience with feelings of failure, misery, guilt, alienation, and co-morbid depression. TMD is a collective term embracing chronic pain conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint or the masticatory muscles as well as their associated structures. TMD has a prevalence of approximately 10-20% and is 1.5 to 2 times more prevalent in women. It is often associated with restricted mouth opening capacity, pain upon chewing, muscle soreness and headache, thus affecting quality of life considerably although it is not life threatening. The prevalence of reported chronic pain in children and adolescents is high, and similar to the prevalence in adults. The worldwide variation in the prevalence of TMD in children and adolescents ranges from 6% to 69%. Many studies reported that TMD, headache and abdominal pain are the most common chronic pain affecting children and adolescents.

Children and adolescents are treated with routine treatment approaches for adults and one of the most commonly used treatments are occlusal appliances. The use of occlusal appliances in managing orofacial pain conditions is supported by evidence, but only for adults. However, the efficacy of the treatment approaches and any possible side-effects/impairment of mandibular growth are absent. To our knowledge the only two high-quality studies present have investigated adolescents with permanent dentition (12-19 years), but there are no studies in the growing child with primary or mixed dentition (7-14 years). Hence, there is no knowledge if there is an effective treatment and if such a treatment with a resilient occlusal appliance impair the mandibular growth in these children.

Taken together there is immense need for research on treatment of children/adolescents with orofacial pain and following their growth in order to be able to provide effective and safe treatment. Also, to investigate the knowledge-base among care-givers, giving the opportunity to improve the content of the education which in turn would lead to better, faster management of these children/adolescents who actually are our future.

Therefore, the aim of this non-inferiority project is to investigate the effectiveness and possible side-effects of different treatment modalities, such as an occlusal appliance, jaw exercises, NSAID for the conditions myalgia orarthralgia in the orofacial region in children with primary or mixed dentition.

The hypotheses are that: 1) there will be no significant differences in treatment outcome between the use of a soft occlusal appliance and standardized jaw exercises in children with myalgia but that the soft occlusal appliance and the standardized jaw exercises are superior to instructions of self-care; 2) the soft occlusal appliance does not affect the mandibular growth nor the dental eruption pattern; 3) there will be no significant differences in treatment outcome between the use of a soft occlusal appliance, or NSAIDs in children with arthralgia, but that the soft occlusal appliance and the NSAIDs are superior to instructions of self-care.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Investigator)

Masking Description

The investigator is blinded to treatment that is performed by a specialist in orofacial pain. The patient is instructed to not reveal the treatment to the investigator

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
7 Years to 13 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • age 7-14 years
  • a diagnosis of myalgia or arthralgia according to DC/TMD
  • self-assessed average TMD pain intensity of ≥ 30 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) during one week prior to examination.
  • The patients will remain included with one or several co-diagnoses of:
  • disc displacement with or without reduction according to DC/TMD
  • degenerative joint disease.

Exclusion Criteria

  • diagnosed systemic muscular or joint diseases (e.g. fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis)
  • whiplash associated disorder (WAD)
  • neuropathic pain or neurological disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, orofacial dystonia)
  • history of psychiatric disorders, and 5) pain of dental origin.

Arms & Interventions

Jaw exercises

Active Comparator

Resistance exercises to do twice a day

Intervention: Jaw exercises (Behavioral)

Jaw exercises

Active Comparator

Resistance exercises to do twice a day

Intervention: Counseling (Behavioral)

Counseling

Active Comparator

Just information at the first visit

Intervention: Soft occlusal appliance (Device)

Counseling

Active Comparator

Just information at the first visit

Intervention: Jaw exercises (Behavioral)

Counseling

Active Comparator

Just information at the first visit

Intervention: Counseling (Behavioral)

Jaw exercises

Active Comparator

Resistance exercises to do twice a day

Intervention: Soft occlusal appliance (Device)

Soft occlusal appliance

Active Comparator

Individually casted appliances

Intervention: Soft occlusal appliance (Device)

Soft occlusal appliance

Active Comparator

Individually casted appliances

Intervention: Jaw exercises (Behavioral)

Soft occlusal appliance

Active Comparator

Individually casted appliances

Intervention: Counseling (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Responders to treatment - median weekly pain intensity

Time Frame: 1-6 months

30% decrease in median weekly pain intensity using a numeric rating scale 0-10 rating the worst pain daily

Responders to treatment - Patients global impression change scale

Time Frame: 1-6 months

The patients global impression change scale (PGIC) will be used. PGIC is a 7-point scale with the following options: 0 = eliminated, 1 = much improved, 2 = improved, 3 = unchanged, 4 = impaired, 5 = much impaired and 6 = very much impaired

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in emotional status(1-6 months)
  • Daily activities(1-6 months)
  • Change in physical functioning using the Graded Chronic Painscale (GCPS)(1-6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nikolaos Christidis

Associate professor, Senior Lecturer, Senior Consultant

Karolinska Institutet

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials