MedPath

A Randomized Controlled Trial on EGBD vs PC for Acute Cholecystitis.

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Acute Cholecystitis
Interventions
Procedure: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD)
Procedure: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)
Registration Number
NCT02212717
Lead Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients that are high-risk candidates for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is frequently employed for gallbladder drainage in these patients. Recently, the feasibility of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) in treatment of this condition has been demonstrated but how the two procedures compare to one another is uncertain.

The aim of this study is to compare EGBD versus PC as a definitive treatment, in high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis in a randomized controlled trial. We hypothesize that EGBD can reduce the morbidity, re-intervention and mortality when compared to PC.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years old admitted for acute cholecystitis but are unsuitable for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions including: American society of anesthesiology grading ≥ 3, APACHE score ≥ 12, limited life expectancy (less than 2 years) or deemed unsuitable for general anesthesia would be included.
  • Written informed consent from patient or guardian who is able to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
  • Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder
  • Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)
  • Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices
  • Abnormal coagulation: INR > 1.5 and/or platelets < 50.000/mm3
  • Previous drainage of the gallbladder
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EUS-guided gallbladder drainageEUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD)-
Percutaneous cholecystomyPercutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall morbidities1 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Technical success30 days

Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the gallbladder by placement of a drainage tube or stent.

Pain scores7 days

Pain assessment would be performed using the visual-analogue scale (1 to 100) on post-procedural days 1 to 7.

Analgesic requirements7 days

The amount of analgesic consumed during admission will be recorded and compared between groups. Oral panadol and intravenous tramadol (or equivalent) would be provided as required to patients.

Stone clearance rates1 years

The presence or absence of gallstones after 1 years would be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography

Clinical success30 days

Clinical success is obtained when the patient is afebrile and had more than 20% decrease in white cell counts.

Reintervention rate1 year

The number of patients requiring biliary related re-interventions within 1 year

Re-admission rate1 year

The number of patients requiring hospital re-admissions due to biliary related events

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

Chinese University of Hong Kong

🇨🇳

Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Kinki University Hospital

🇯🇵

Osaka, Japan

University Hospital Rio Hortega

🇪🇸

Barcelona, Spain

Tokyo Medical University Hospital

🇯🇵

Tokyo, Japan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath