A Randomized Controlled Trial on EGBD vs PC for Acute Cholecystitis.
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Interventions
- Procedure: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD)Procedure: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)
- Registration Number
- NCT02212717
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients that are high-risk candidates for surgery. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is frequently employed for gallbladder drainage in these patients. Recently, the feasibility of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) in treatment of this condition has been demonstrated but how the two procedures compare to one another is uncertain.
The aim of this study is to compare EGBD versus PC as a definitive treatment, in high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis in a randomized controlled trial. We hypothesize that EGBD can reduce the morbidity, re-intervention and mortality when compared to PC.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years old admitted for acute cholecystitis but are unsuitable for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions including: American society of anesthesiology grading ≥ 3, APACHE score ≥ 12, limited life expectancy (less than 2 years) or deemed unsuitable for general anesthesia would be included.
- Written informed consent from patient or guardian who is able to understand the nature and possible consequences of the study
- Pregnancy
- Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
- Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder
- Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)
- Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum
- Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices
- Abnormal coagulation: INR > 1.5 and/or platelets < 50.000/mm3
- Previous drainage of the gallbladder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description EUS-guided gallbladder drainage EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EGBD) - Percutaneous cholecystomy Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall morbidities 1 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Technical success 30 days Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the gallbladder by placement of a drainage tube or stent.
Pain scores 7 days Pain assessment would be performed using the visual-analogue scale (1 to 100) on post-procedural days 1 to 7.
Analgesic requirements 7 days The amount of analgesic consumed during admission will be recorded and compared between groups. Oral panadol and intravenous tramadol (or equivalent) would be provided as required to patients.
Stone clearance rates 1 years The presence or absence of gallstones after 1 years would be assessed by abdominal ultrasonography
Clinical success 30 days Clinical success is obtained when the patient is afebrile and had more than 20% decrease in white cell counts.
Reintervention rate 1 year The number of patients requiring biliary related re-interventions within 1 year
Re-admission rate 1 year The number of patients requiring hospital re-admissions due to biliary related events
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Chinese University of Hong Kong
🇨🇳Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Kinki University Hospital
🇯🇵Osaka, Japan
University Hospital Rio Hortega
🇪🇸Barcelona, Spain
Tokyo Medical University Hospital
🇯🇵Tokyo, Japan