EUS-GBD vs Antibiotics for Patients at High Risk for Cholecystectomy
- Conditions
- Acute Cholecystitis
- Interventions
- Drug: Antibiotics firstProcedure: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage
- Registration Number
- NCT05893511
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Objectives Acute cholecystitis commonly occurs in elderly patients who are at high-risk for surgery. Whether upfront Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) is advantageous over antibiotics first for mild acute cholecystitis is uncertain.
Hypothesis to be tested The aim is to compare EUS-GBD versus standard protocol (antibiotics first) as a definitive treatment, in very high-risk patients suffering from mild to moderate acute cholecystitis. We hypothesize that EUS-GBD can reduce the 1-year risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis.
Design and subjects This is an international randomised controlled study including consecutive patients suffering from acute cholecystitis that are very high-risk for cholecystectomy. The patients would be randomized to receive EUS-GBD or antibiotics first.
Interventions: EUS-GBD versus antibiotics
Main outcome measures:
The primary outcome is the rate of recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. Other outcomes include technical and clinical success, post-procedural pain scores, analgesic requirements, adverse events, re-admissions, re-interventions, quality of life and cost analysis.
Data analysis All outcomes would be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test will be used to compare differences in recurrent acute cholecystitis in 1 year. A health economic analysis will also be performed. Assuming a 17.1% difference in recurrent acute cholecystitis rates, a 2-sided P value of 0.05, a power of 80%, and a 10% dropout rate, 110 patients is required.
Expected results The findings of this study can help establish the role of EUS-GBD in management of high-risk patients suffering from acute cholecystitis over antibiotics alone and Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 110
- Consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 years old
- Suffering from grade 1 or 2 acute calculous cholecystitis*
- At very high-risk for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to poor premorbid conditions** or elderly patients suffering from acute cholecystitis but refused operations
Patients with the following conditions are excluded from the study:
- Pregnancy
- Patients unwilling to undergo follow-up assessments
- Patients with suspected gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder
- Grade III acute cholecystitis33
- Patients diagnosed with concomitant liver abscess or pancreatitis (defined as elevated serum amylase more than three times the upper limit of normal)
- Altered anatomy of the upper gastrointestinal tract due to surgery of the esophagus, stomach and duodenum
- Patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and/or gastric varices
- Abnormal coagulation: International normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 and/or platelets < 50.000/mm3
- Previous drainage of the gallbladder
- Patients suffering acute cholecystitis due to malignant cystic duct obstruction
- Patients with life expectancy of less than 3 years
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Antibiotics first group Antibiotics first Antibiotics first equals to intravenous antibiotics 2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would first be given parenterally and then switched to oral form when patient can tolerate diet or when sepsis subside. It will be continued for at least a total of 7 days. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage Prior to the procedure, the patients would be kept fasted for 6 hours and antibiotics would be commenced (2nd generation cephalosporin or equivalent). Antibiotics would be continued for up to one week after the procedure.EUS-GBD would be performed by either the conventional or direct method.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1-year recurrent acute cholecystitis rate 1-year recurrent acute cholecystitis rate in 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse events 1-year Any adverse events occured in 1 year will be recorded
Total number of unplanned readmissions related to acute cholecystitis and reinterventions 1-year The total number and the reason of any unplanned readmissions related to acute cholecystitis and reinterventions in 1 year will be recorded.
Cost-effectiveness measurement 1-year 1. All costs in the antibiotics first arm would be recorded: the cost of using antibiotics (dose, frequency, duration), the cost of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage (PT-GBD) and subsequent cholecystogram if any
2. All costs in the EUS-GBD arm would be recorded: the cost of EUS-GBD procedure (including the procedure itself, anaesthesia, Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), needle, guidewire), cost of managing complications if any
3. All costs in both arms would be recorded:
i. Index admission: the cost of investigations (blood test, imaging), medications, hospital stay ii. Unplanned readmissions: the cost of investigations, medications, reinterventions (cost of procedure and its equipment) iii. Cost of the follow-up clinic visitsClinical success 1-year Clinical success is defined as improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory test (i.e. liver function test and complete blood count)
Technical success 1-year Technical success is defined as the ability to access and drain the gallbladder by placement of a drainage tube or maintenance of good drainage.
Daily post-procedural pain scores for the first 7 days 7 days Pain assessment would be performed using the visual-analogue scale (1 to 100) on post-procedural days 1 to 7.
Type and dosage of analgesic required an average of 7 days Type and the dosage of the analgesic required after procedure/administered of antibiotics would be recorded.
Quality of life assessment 1-year EQ-5D on admission (before randomisation) and at every follow-up clinic visit
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Chinese Universtiy of Hong Kong
🇭🇰Hong Kong, Hong Kong