Conventional Ultrasound Versus Remote Ultraportable ulTrasound in the Context of Viral Hepatitis
Not yet recruiting
- Conditions
- HepatitisTeleradiology
- Registration Number
- NCT06571981
- Lead Sponsor
- Naik Vietti Violi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:<br><br> - Informed Consent signed by the subject<br><br> - All adult patients with viral hepatitis for which an ultrasound is planned<br><br>Exclusion Criteria:<br><br> - Known or suspected non-compliance<br><br> - Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems,<br> psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,<br><br> - Previous enrollment into the current study
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of TUP versus CUS for abdominal imaging in patients with viral hepatitis according to US LI-RADS categories ) for liver lesions
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method liver visualization scores;liver surface nodularity;focal lesions;caudate lobe dimensions;portal flow velocity;biliary tract / gallbladder abnormalities;lymph nodes presence;free fluid;examination time;audio quality;video quality;patient's satisfaction;agreement rates between reports