跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03380065
NCT03380065已完成不适用

Comparison of Two Protocols for Deflation of Radial Band Following Coronary Procedures Via the Radial Route

Sultan Qaboos University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2018年1月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
Total deflation time

研究概览

简要总结

Coronary angiography is now mainly performed via the radial route rather than the femoral route. At the end of the procedure, the sheath is removed and a band is inflated to obtain hemostasis. The air in the band is then deflated at regular intervals. Currently there are different protocols for deflation of the band, but none of these have been studied with regards to patient comfort and time of deflation, and potential complications such as bleeding. Here in this study the investigators wish to compare two such protocols of band deflation and assess the levels of patient comfort and time to discharge with two widely used protocols.

详细描述

Coronary angiography is a procedure by which the anatomy of the coronary arteries are studied. It can be done either via the radial artery approach or the femoral artery approach. Currently most centers use the radial artery approach due to the lower risk of access site bleeding as compared to the femoral artery approach. In addition, the radial approach allows earlier patient mobilisation after the procedure.

Once the sheath, through which the procedure is done, is removed, a special air filled band is used to compress the artery to prevent bleeding. This involves filling the band with around 18 ml of air and then releasing the air at periodic intervals. There are however no set protocols for the removal of air and literature often suggests varying protocols. However what the protocols try to achieve is proper hemostasis, with low incidence of radial artery occlusion. In addition to these, patient comfort and safety along with staff ease of use is important. Some protocols involve frequent deflations which might be more tedious for the nurses, but more comfortable for patients whilst others might be easier for the staff (due to longer intervals), but more uncomfortable for the patients. However, there are no studies that actually compare these protocols

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •All patients undergoing coronary procedures via the radial route

排除标准

  • •Those below the age of 18 and those unable to give consent

研究组 & 干预措施

Late deflation of TR band

Active Comparator
  1. first 3ml of air removed from the TR band after TWO hour of sheath removal. Then, 3ml of air removed every 15minutes.
  2. Observe for any bleeding or hematoma. During every deflation, if any bleeding or hematoma is noticed then 3ml of air is pushed back into the device until bleeding stops. Then wait for another 15minutes for the next deflation.

干预措施: Late deflation of TR band (Device)

Early deflation of TR band

Active Comparator
  1. First 2ml of air is removed from the TR band ONE hour after sheath removal. Then, 2ml of air is removed every 30minutes.
  2. Observe for any bleeding or hematoma. During every deflation, if any bleeding or hematoma is noticed then push the 2ml of air back into the device until bleeding stops. Then wait for another 30minutes for the next deflation.

干预措施: Early deflation of TR band (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Total deflation time

时间窗: 2 hours

To see how quickly the band can be removed in each arm

次要结局

  • Patient satisfaction(2 hours)
  • Staff satisfaction(2 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

SUNIL NADAR

Senior Consultant

Sultan Qaboos University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验