Pain, Function and Range of Motion Related Outcomes of Mulligan Concept Applications in Obese Individuals With Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain, Mechanical
- Sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Enrollment
- 46
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Pain Assessment
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the effectiveness of Mulligan mobilisation techniques Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGS) and Natural Apophyseal Glides (NAGs) on pain, disability, and range of motion (ROM) in obese individuals with mechanical low back pain (LBP).
Detailed Description
One of the most important methods in the treatment of LBP in recent years is manual therapy; manipulation, mobilisation and soft tissue techniques. With the manual techniques applied to the spine, the position and placement of the anatomical structures are changed and the tight and tense tissues are loosened. It has been observed that Mulligan techniques can correct the faults that cause pain in the spine and that the structures that cause pain return to their normal functions when released. In the literature, it has recently been observed that the number of studies examining manual therapy and Mulligan Concept methods has increased. Studies examining the effect of SNAG method on the lumbar region (12) and the effect of mobilisation and taping on chronic low back pain were found. However, no study was found in which SNAG and NAGS applications were applied on obese patients diagnosed with mechanical low back pain. Therefore, in this study, SNAG and NAGS in obese patients with LBP to investigate the effectiveness of the practices
Investigators
Ömer Osman Pala
Assist. Prof
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •diagnosed with mechanical low back pain, Body Mass Index (BMI) was between 30.00-39.99, 1.-
- •Forty-six patients, aged 20-50 years, who were extremely obese and had pain radiating to the lower back and hips for at least 3 months,
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)
Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of mechanical neck pain. Individuals were asked to mark the pain they felt on a 10 cm long VAS scale ("0" indicates no pain and "10" indicates unbearable pain).
The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)
Evaluate back disability status a questionnaire consisting of 10 items. The items measure the severity of pain, self-care, lifting and carrying, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travelling and the degree of change in pain, respectively. Under each item, the patient was asked six statements to be marked. The first statement is scored as "0" and the sixth statement is scored as "5". The higher the score, the higher the level of disability.
Joint Range of Motion Assessment (ROM)
Time Frame: Two times in 11 day (before intervention, immediately after last intervention)
Active flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion and rotation of the cervical region were measured in the sitting position with a phone goniometer application.