跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2020/09/027912
CTRI/2020/09/027912尚未招募3 期

Efficacy of Geomer technology(beauti sealant) compared toHydrophilic technology(embrace wet bond sealant)-A randomized clinical trial

BChaitanyaBharathi0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
尚未招募
发起方

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1.Subjects between age group of 11-13 years
  • 2. A Deep occlusal surface, fissure or incisal
  • lingual pit is present.3.The area selected is confined to a full erupted
  • fossa, even though the distal fossa is impossible to
  • seal due time inadequate eruption
  • 4.The fossa selected for sealant placement is well
  • isolated from another fossa with a restoration
  • 5.subjects who will ready to follow the instructions
  • during study period.
  • 6.subjects who willing to participate in the study
  • with written informed consent.

排除标准

  • 1.Subject behavior does not permit use of adequate
  • dry field techniques through the procedure.
  • 2.An open carious lesion3.Caries exist on other surface of the same tooth in
  • which restoring will disrupt an intact sealant
  • 4.A large restoration is already present.
  • 6.History of any adverse reaction to any of the
  • restorative material used
  • 7.History of abnormal parafunctional activity
  • 8.Heavy occlusal contacts on the teeth to be
  • 9.History of any medical disease that might
  • interfere with the study
  • 10. Highly uncooperative child

研究者

发起方
BChaitanyaBharathi

相似试验

Efficacy of beauti sealnt compared to embrace wet... | 临床试验