MedPath

The Association Between Conditioned Pain Modulation and Pain Catastrophizing in Chronic Low Back Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Low Back Pain
Pain, Somatic
Catastrophizing Pain
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: PPT measurement
Diagnostic Test: Pain catastrophizing scale
Procedure: Cold Pressor Test
Registration Number
NCT03644810
Lead Sponsor
Aalborg University
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the potential association between pain catastrophizing thoughts and the ability to dampen pain via endogenous descending inhibition. Half of the participants are persons with chronic low back pain and the other half are age and gender-matched controls

Detailed Description

Pain catastrophizing is a cognitive feature commonly seen in various musculoskeletal pain population and is considered an important factor to account for in rehabilitation. The ability to dampen pain via endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms is likewise known to be reduced in musculoskeletal pain conditions.

Studies utilizing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have demonstrated that the supraspinal areas involved in pain-related cognitive processing to a great extent overlap with those involved in endogenous pain modulation. Therefore, it is plausible that factors such as pain catastrophizing thoughts may affect the nervous systems ability to dampen pain.

Chronic low back pain is the single clinical problem with the biggest impact in the modern society. Previous studies have demonstrated that pain catastrophizing and reduced endogenous pain inhibition are part of the clinical picture. However, previous studies have never investigated a potential relationship between these two factors.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
44
Inclusion Criteria

Low back pain group:

  • chronic low back pain ( lasting more than 3 months)
  • intensity of ≥ 3/10 on a numeric rating scale
  • pain is located in the area between the gluteal folds below to the thoracolumbal junction above.

Controls:

No current or previous history of musculoskeletal pain of ongoing nature

Exclusion Criteria

Applies for both groups:

  • Signs of radicular pain or other specific medical conditions e.g. rheumatologic disease or diabetes
  • Pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Healthy controlsPain catastrophizing scaleHealthy, pain-free individuals who are age and gender matched to the low back pain group fill out the pain catastrophizing scale Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Chronic low back painPain catastrophizing scaleIndividuals with chronic low back pain. Baseline assessment of pain intensity, function, pain duration and pain catastrophizing thoughts is performed Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Healthy controlsCold Pressor TestHealthy, pain-free individuals who are age and gender matched to the low back pain group fill out the pain catastrophizing scale Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Chronic low back painPPT measurementIndividuals with chronic low back pain. Baseline assessment of pain intensity, function, pain duration and pain catastrophizing thoughts is performed Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Healthy controlsPPT measurementHealthy, pain-free individuals who are age and gender matched to the low back pain group fill out the pain catastrophizing scale Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Chronic low back painCold Pressor TestIndividuals with chronic low back pain. Baseline assessment of pain intensity, function, pain duration and pain catastrophizing thoughts is performed Pain sensitivity at the back and lower leg is measured at baseline and immediately after performing the cold pressor test
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Association between levels of pain catastrophizing thoughts and endogenous pain inhibitionOne session (45 min)

The pain catastrophizing scale score is correlated with the changes in Pressure Pain Thresholds before and after the cold pressor test

See descriptions of each assessment method below (outcome 2 and outcome 3, respectively)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in pressure pain thresholds (determined with pressure algometry) before and after the cold pressor test30 minutes

Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) are assessed before and after the cold pressor test

PPT measure the pressure needed to experience the first instance of pain. For this purpose, a pressure algometer (a pistol-like device with a 1cm2 contact surface) is used. Higher levels of pressure reflect lower pain sensitivity.

In the cold pressor test, the subject is asked to submerge one hand into circulating water (constant temperature: 4 degrees C) for 2 minutes. When removing it from the water, the subject is asked to indicate the perceived pain using a numeric rating scale (see below). Before and after the cold pressor test, the PPT measurements are performed. The difference in PPT values before and after the cold pressor test is used in the correlation analysis described in outcome 1.

The numeric rating scale is used to determine the perceived pain intensity from the cold water. The scale is runs from 0 - 10 where 0 is anchored with no pain and 10 reflects the worst pain imaginable

Catastrophizing thoughts measured with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale15 minutes

The pain catastrophizing score by filling out the pain catastrophizing scale.The pain catastrophizing scale consists of 13 sentences describing pain-related thoughts or feelings. These are divided into 3 domains: rumination, magnification and helplessness. The subject is asked to indicate how how well each sentence applies for them: 0 = not at all, 1 = to a slight degree, 2 = to a moderate degree, 3 = to a great degree and 4 = all the time.

The total score on the questionnaire can lie between 0 - 52 where a higher score indicates higher levels of pain catastrophizing thoughts.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Spine Centre of Southern Denmark

🇩🇰

Middelfart, Southern Denmark, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath