Treatment of Gingival Recession Using a Coronally Advanced Flap Procedure With or Without Placental Membrane
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Sponsor
- Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital
- Enrollment
- 15
- Primary Endpoint
- Height of Gingival recession
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of placental membrane with coronally advanced flap in covering single and multiple Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.
Detailed Description
STUDY DESIGN A total number of 60 teeth in 15 subjects were selected. Patients with bilateral Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects in the maxillary or mandibular anterior and premolar region were selected and divided into two groups using a split mouth design. GroupI (Control) -30 recession defects treated with coronally advanced flap alone, using Zucchelli's technique. Group II (Test) - 30 recession defects treated with coronally advanced flap, using Zucchelli's technique along with placental membrane. . CLINICAL PARAMETERS: 1. Probing Pocket Depth(PPD) 2. Clinical Attachment Level(CAL) 3. Height of Gingival Recession(HGR) 4. Width of Gingival Recession(WGR) 5. Width of Keratinized Gingiva(WKG) The clinical parameters were assessed \& recorded on 0 day, 90th day and 180th day
Investigators
Dr.Jaideep Mahendra
Professor
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients within the age group 23 to 55 years
- •Bilateral, upper or lower, Miller's class I and Class II gingival recession defects confined to the anterior and premolar region.
- •Presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction
- •Presence of keratinized tissue apical to the exposed root
Exclusion Criteria
- •Systemic complications
- •Occlusal interferences
- •Any contraindication for periodontal surgery and taking medication which are known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing
- •Previous periodontal surgery on the involved site
- •Pregnant and lactating mothers
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Height of Gingival recession
Time Frame: 6 months
The height of gingival recession was measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin using Williams periodontal probe
Secondary Outcomes
- Width of Keratinized Gingiva(Baseline and 6 months)
- Clinical attachment level(Baseline and 6 months)