MedPath

A study to find out whether repeat caeserean section is better than planned vaginal delivery for the baby and mother in women who has undergone Caesarean section earlier.

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O618- Other failed induction of labor
Registration Number
CTRI/2020/06/026114
Lead Sponsor
JIPMER Puducherry
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1. Women with >18 years with previous one LSCS.

2. Singleton pregnancy

3. Vertex presentation

4.Those who fulfill eligiblity criteria for trial of labour listed below.

a.Estimated fetal weight less than 3.5 kg as per the scan.

b.Non recurrent indication for previous section.

c.Scar thickness more than 3 mm.

d.No clinical evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion

e.Inter pregnancy interval greater than18 months

Exclusion Criteria

Women with severe intra uterine growth restriction( <2 kg) and severe preeclampsia,uncontrolled diabetes.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of composite adverse perinatal outcome between elective repeat Caesarean section and induction of labour among women with pervious one LSCS requiring termination of pregnancy.Timepoint: 1. At delivery <br/ ><br>2. At discharge from hospital
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare maternal outcome in the two groupsTimepoint: from during labour/at ceasarean till discharge from hospital
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath