MedPath

Bridging the Childhood Epilepsy Treatment Gap in Africa

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Epilepsy
Interventions
Other: Task-shifting of follow-up care for pediatric epilepsy
Other: Enhanced usual care for pediatric epilepsy
Registration Number
NCT04290975
Lead Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Brief Summary

About half of the world's children with epilepsy do not receive treatment - known as the epilepsy treatment gap - with significantly higher rates (67%-90%) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We will conduct the first cluster-randomized clinical trial (cRCT) to determine the efficacy, implementation, and cost-effectiveness of a novel intervention shifting childhood epilepsy care to epilepsy-trained community health extension workers in an effort to close the epilepsy treatment gap. This research will provide information to help extend epilepsy treatment to children in LMICs and worldwide who suffer from untreated seizures.

Detailed Description

Epilepsy is the most common severe neurological disorder among children. Most children with epilepsy, if treated, can live normal lives. Yet among the world's children living with epilepsy, about 80% of whom reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), about half do not receive treatment; this is described as "the childhood epilepsy treatment gap." Among the LMICs of Africa, the childhood epilepsy treatment gap is about 67%-90% - unchanged for over twenty years. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) and other health agencies recommend that the epilepsy treatment gap be bridged by task shifting epilepsy care to community health extension workers (CHWs) in primary care settings, this recommendation has not been implemented on a large scale. This failure to scale up task shifting in epilepsy care is due to (a) inadequate evidence of efficacy of task-shifted epilepsy care, (b) a lack of methods and tools for implementing epilepsy task shifting, (c) inadequate understanding of task-shifted epilepsy care barriers, and (d) a lack of cost-effectiveness data for health policymakers. CHWs providing task-shifted epilepsy care must identify children with epilepsy, disadvantaged by stigma and unknown to the healthcare system, who are without access to neurologists or electroencephalograms (EEGs). An epilepsy screening tool in the local language (e.g., Hausa) is therefore essential for epilepsy diagnosis, seizure type classification, and medical management. Hausa, the most commonly spoken language in west Africa, with over 120 million Hausa speakers, is used in daily life, commerce, and education; our proposed study will be conducted in three major cities in Hausa-speaking Africa.

Funded by an R21 grant (R21TW010899) in preparation for this cluster-randomized clinical trial (cRCT), we developed and piloted in Kano, Nigeria (a) a scalable epilepsy training program for CHWs, (b) an epilepsy community education program in Hausa to facilitate screening, diagnosis and treatment; and (c) an epilepsy data management system. We also (d) validated an epilepsy screening, diagnosis, and seizure classification tool in Hausa, (e) demonstrated feasibility of screening and enrolling children in a cRCT of task-shifted epilepsy care, and (f) piloted a task-shifted epilepsy diagnosis and management protocol. We will now conduct the first cRCT of task-shifted childhood epilepsy care in Africa with the following specific aims:

1. Conduct a non-inferiority cRCT of a task-shifted childhood epilepsy care protocol compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) in three Hausa-speaking cities in northern Nigeria. We will enroll a maximum of 1800 children (age 6 mo, \<18 yrs) with epilepsy across 60 randomly selected primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in Kano (30 PHCs), Kaduna (16 PHCs) and Zaria (14 PHCs). PHCs will be randomly assigned to intervention (task-shifted to CHWS childhood epilepsy care; 30 PHCs) or EUC (referral to a physician for epilepsy management; 30 PHCs). Primary outcome: we hypothesize that the proportion of children seizure-free for ≥ 6 months at 24 months follow-up (primary outcome) will be similar in the intervention and EUC arms. Secondary outcomes at 24 months include (a) percent seizure reduction from baseline, (b) time to next seizure after 3 months seizure-free, and (c) accuracy of epilepsy diagnosis and seizure type classification by CHWs compared to assessments by physician epilepsy specialists, blinded to the randomization arm.

2. Assess socio-behavioral and implementation outcomes among providers, parents/guardians and patients in the cRCT. Outcome measures include: (1) Difference in baseline, 12- and 24-month intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility measures among providers in the task-shifted intervention arm of the cRCT; (2) Difference in baseline, 12- and 24-month quality of life, epilepsy knowledge and stigma, and trust in the healthcare system and providers among participants; (3) Comparison of 12- and 24-month quality of life, knowledge and stigma and trust measures among participants in the intervention and control arms.

3. Determine the cost-effectiveness of the task-shifted epilepsy care intervention. Direct costs of the intervention and EUC will include personnel costs (including CHW epilepsy training) and expenses for diagnostic (EEG, brain imaging) and laboratory tests and anti-epileptic drugs. Indirect costs will include travel time and time away from work for parents/guardians and change in school attendance for patients. Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as US dollars per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

This project will also establish a brain disorders clinical research network for Hausa-speaking Africa and provide data for health system leaders and policymakers to scale-up task-shifted childhood epilepsy care.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1800
Inclusion Criteria
  • Resident of Kano or Kaduna states and living in the Kano, Zaria, or Kaduna metropolitan areas of northern Nigeria
  • Parent or guardian provided informed consent for the screening questionnaire given to the parent/guardian
  • Parent or guardian informed consent, plus assent for children >7 years able to provide assent, for epilepsy diagnostic evaluation if the screening for possible epilepsy is positive
  • Diagnosed with possible epilepsy through initial screening, and then diagnosed with epilepsy upon further evaluation by an epilepsy-trained CHW working with the BRIDGE project, who may consult a BRIDGE physician for diagnostic questions
  • Parent or guardian provided consent, and assent for children >7 years able to provide assent, for enrollment in the cRCT of task-shifted epilepsy care versus enhanced physician epilepsy care
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children who have previously been diagnosed with epilepsy and are currently enrolled in other care and treatment, or who have been treated for epilepsy within three months prior to screening
  • Children who are currently receiving care by a neurologist or neurosurgeon for a serious brain disorder (e.g., brain tumor, stroke)
  • Lack of informed consent, and/or lack of assent from children >7 years who are able to provide assent.Inability of the parent or guardian to communicate with healthcare providers in either Hausa or English
  • Any child who screens positive for epilepsy, has epilepsy upon clinical evaluation, but does not live in Kano, Zaria, and Kaduna, and who is in the judgement of the parents and/or BRIDGE staff to be unable to comply with the study visits because of travel distance from home.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Task-shifted armTask-shifting of follow-up care for pediatric epilepsyIn the task-shifted arm, all children will be prescribed anti-epileptic medication and receive follow-up care from a CHW, with a physician consult available to the CHW as needed.
Enhanced usual care armEnhanced usual care for pediatric epilepsyIn the enhanced usual care arm, all children will be prescribed anti-epileptic medication and receive follow-up care from a physician, with a CHW collecting standardized data to mirror that of the intervention arm.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage seizure-freeMust be seizure-free for 6 or more months at the 24-month visit follow-up visit

Percentage of children in each arm of the study who are seizure-free

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reduction in seizure frequencyEvaluated at 24 months in both arms compared to enrollment (baseline) data

75% reduction in seizure frequency

Diagnostic accuracyEvaluated by blinded physicians at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after enrollment

Diagnostic accuracy among study subjects in both arms, determined by blinded physicians

MortalityOnce, at study conclusion (24 months after enrollment of final subject)

Differences in mortality between study arms that cannot be explained by potential differences in disease severity

Task-shifted protocol adherenceOnce, at study conclusion (24 months after enrollment of final subject)

Percentage adherence by CHWs to protocol in the task-shifted arm

Anytime 6-month seizure-free intervalAssessed at 4 time points during 24-month follow-up: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months

6-month seizure-free intervals as determined by evaluations by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, blinded as to the arm of the study, at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after enrollment. These blinded physicians with expertise in epilepsy will record seizure frequency (including seizure-freedom) on standardized case report forms, facilitated by blinded physician review of daily seizure logs maintained by parents/guardians that will indicate the specific dates and durations of all recorded seizures.

Diagnostic tests orderedOnce, at study conclusion (24 months after enrollment of final subject)

Differences by study arm in number and type of diagnostic tests (e.g., MRIs, EEGs) ordered

Status epilepticusAssessed at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months after enrollment, with analysis of outcome at study conclusion (24 months after enrollment of final subject)

Difference in frequency of episodes of status epilepticus among children in both arms of the study, as measured by questions in standardized case report forms completed by physicians with expertise in epilepsy, who are blinded as to the arm of the study. The blinded physicians will review a daily seizure log which indicates estimated seizure duration for each seizure, maintained by the parent/guardian, to facilitate the blinded physician evaluation.

MorbidityOnce, at study conclusion (24 months after enrollment of final subject)

Differences in morbidity, including neurodevelopmental morbidity, associated with epilepsy between study arms that emerged during the cRCT

Seizure freedom in response to first prescribed anti-epileptic drug6 months after enrollment of final subject

Percentage of children seizure free for 6 months or longer in response to the first anti-epileptic drug prescribed, as measured by questions in standardized case report forms completed by physicians with epilepsy expertise, blinded as to the arm of the study. The blinded physicians will review a daily seizure log which indicates the occurrence and duration of each seizure, maintained by the parent/guardian, to facilitate the blinded physician evaluation.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital

🇳🇬

Kano, Nigeria

Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital

🇳🇬

Kaduna, Nigeria

Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital

🇳🇬

Zaria, Nigeria

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath