Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01257347
NCT01257347
Completed
Not Applicable

Uncontrolled Hypertension: The Role of Medication Adherence and Clinical Inertia

Columbia University1 site in 1 country124 target enrollmentJanuary 2011
ConditionsHypertension

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Hypertension
Sponsor
Columbia University
Enrollment
124
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of Visits With Appropriate Hypertension Management
Status
Completed
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test whether accurately measuring patients' adherence to their blood pressure medications with electronic pillbox monitors and then providing clinicians with this information can improve the clinical management of uncontrolled hypertension.

Detailed Description

Despite the presence of numerous effective medications, one-half of the adults receiving treatment for hypertension in the United States have uncontrolled blood pressure. At least one-third of these hypertensive patients are not adherent to their blood pressure medications. Given this high rate of non-adherence, clinicians will ideally consider whether their patients are taking their pills before deciding whether to intensify a blood pressure regimen. Yet, in practice, clinicians are often unsure about their patients' level of adherence. This uncertainty limits clinicians' ability to optimally manage hypertension. Electronic medication monitors represent the gold-standard for objectively measuring day-to-day adherence. As a result, they have the potential to best reduce uncertainty regarding medication adherence. The goal of this study is to test whether providing clinicians with an objective measure of medication adherence obtained through electronic monitoring can improve clinician management of uncontrolled hypertension. When data from monitoring indicate poor adherence, it may motivate clinicians to counsel their patients on adherence. Conversely, when data from monitoring indicate good adherence among patients with uncontrolled hypertension, it may motivate clinicians to intensify treatment rather than presume patients were non-adherent. To test this hypothesis, this study will first enroll and randomize 30 primary care clinicians. Clinicians randomized to the intervention will be trained in the use of a quantitative report that summarizes their patients' adherence to blood pressure medications; they will receive these reports during visits with patients who later get enrolled in the study. The study will then enroll 300 patients with uncontrolled hypertension from the same clinic. These patients will then have their adherence to up to 4 blood pressure medications measured by an electronic pillbox. The MedSignals® pillbox (LIFETECHniques Inc., San Antonio, TX) is small (5"x3½"x1"), easily portable, and can simultaneous monitor adherence to up to four medications. The device records a pill as taken each time the individual pillbox lid is opened and closed. Data on adherence are easily uploaded (\< 1 minute) by connecting the pillbox to a telephone line. Patients will return to the clinic after 1 month of taking their pills from the electronic pillbox for a visit with a research assistant and their clinician. At this time, data from the pillboxes will be downloaded and used to generate an adherence report. The report will summarize the percent of days that blood pressure medications were taken as prescribed during the monitoring period and will provide guidance on how to take action based on the data. After the report is generated (\< 5 minutes), patients will attend visits with their clinicians. Clinicians in the intervention group will receive the adherence report at the time of this visit whereas clinicians in the control group will treat patients according to usual care (without report). Hypertension management during the 1-month clinic visit will be assessed after the visit by 1) reviewing the medical note to determine if clinicians intensified hypertension treatment and 2) surveying patients to determine if clinicians counseled them on adherence. Hypertension management will then be compared between groups.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2011
End Date
July 2014
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ian Kronish

Assistant Professor of Medicine

Columbia University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percentage of Visits With Appropriate Hypertension Management

Time Frame: 1 month clinic visit

This is assessed using an algorithm in which patients are categorized as adherent or non-adherent based on electronic monitoring. If patients are adherent (summary measure of adherence to blood pressure medications in the week prior to visit is ≥ 80%), then hypertension management is appropriate if clinicians intensify the hypertension regimen or order testing for secondary hypertension. If patients are non-adherent (summary measure of adherence \< 80%), then hypertension management is appropriate if clinicians take action to increase adherence through counseling or regimen simplification.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of Visits With Hypertension Regimen Simplification, Non-adherent in Week Prior to Outcome Visit or Over Entire Monitoring Period(1 month clinic visit)
  • Percentage of Visits With Counseling Performed During 1-month Visit, Non-adherent in Week Prior to Outcome Visit or Over Entire Monitoring Period(1 month clinic visit)
  • Percentage of Visits With Regimen Intensification During 1-month Visit, Adherent in Week Prior to Outcome Visit, Only(1 month clinic visit)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials