MedPath

BEtter Control of Blood Pressure in Hypertensive pAtients Monitored Using the HOTMAN® sYstem

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Hypertension
Registration Number
NCT01482364
Lead Sponsor
Hemo Sapiens, Inc.
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that monitoring hemodynamic parameters and then applying a predefined algorithm of drug selection (i.e. integrated hemodynamic management - IHM) improves the control of systolic blood pressure (SBP) at ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in hypertensive patients, as compared to classical drug selection (i.e. without IHM) during a 6 months intensive treatment program.

Detailed Description

Early BP control in hypertensives guarantees the best prevention of cardiovascular events on the long term (2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension; VALUE study). However, in spite of education efforts and antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure control rates remain low. The most common cause of uncontrolled BP is inadequate pharmacological treatment, because the selection of antihypertensive agents is often done independently of the hemodynamic status of the patient (volemia, peripheral resistance, cardiac inotropy, heart rate).

Several studies confirmed the value of using impedance cardiography (ICG)-derived hemodynamic data as an adjunct to therapeutic decision-making in the treatment of hypertension.

Working hypothesis: when it is possible to assess the hemodynamic status, and select accordingly the most appropriate pharmacological class of antihypertensive treatment, BP reduction occurs to a greater extent and more rapidly.

In the present study an integrated therapeutic approach (IHM-Integrated Hemodynamic Management)was applied, aiming at detecting permanent vasoconstriction and/or hypervolemia and/or hyperinotropy through the HOTMAN System, in order to select the most appropriate antihypertensive drugs.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
183
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients of either sex presenting with essential hypertension
  • having sustained hypertension both at office BP (SBP>140 mmHg) and at ABPM (SBP>135 mmHg daytime)
  • treated with 2 to 4 antihypertensive drugs
  • aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years
  • after signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnant or lactating female
  • type 1 diabetes
  • patients with pacemaker (ventricular/dual chamber)
  • Severe aortic insufficiency
  • severe hypertension (SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥110 mmHg)
  • resistant hypertension requiring at least 5 antihypertensive drugs
  • secondary hypertension of any aetiology, such as renal disease, pheocromocytoma, or Cushing's syndrome
  • serious disorders which may limit the ability to evaluate the efficacy or safety of the protocol, including cerebrovascular, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, hepatic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (criteria for metabolic syndrome), haematological, oncological, neurological, or psychiatric diseases
  • history of the following pathologies within the last 6 months:
  • myocardial infarction
  • unstable angina pectoris
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • bypass surgery
  • congestive heart failure stage III-IV
  • left branch bundle block
  • atrial fibrillation
  • hypertensive encephalopathy
  • stroke
  • extreme obesity (BMI > 35)
  • previously enrolled subjects
  • alcohol or drug abuse in the past 2 years
  • planned hospitalization during the study period
  • participation in any other clinical study within 30 days prior to screening visit

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Absolute change in daytime SBP, under ambulatory conditions (ABPM) after a 6 months follow-up.baseline and after 6 months of treatment

Absolute change in daytime SBP, under ambulatory conditions (ABPM) after 6 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The percentage of normalization of SBP (<135 mmHg) at ABPMbaseline and after 6 months of treatment

The percentage of normalization of SBP (\<135 mmHg) at ABPM

The absolute change from baseline in 24h SBP-ABPM, in 24h DBP-ABPMbaseline and after 6 months of treatment

The absolute change from baseline in 24h SBP-ABPM, in 24h DBP-ABPM

Rate of side effectsfrom baseline to 6 months of treatment

Rate of side effects

The normalization of hemodynamics (CI, HR and SSVRI), the normalization of PWV and central BPbaseline and after 6 months of treatment

The normalization of hemodynamics (CI, HR and SSVRI), the normalization of PWV and central BP

Trial Locations

Locations (5)

Tallinn Hypertension Excellence Centre

🇪🇪

Tallin, Estonia

Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Milano Hypertension Excellence Center

🇮🇹

Milano, Italy

University of Oslo, Ullevaal Hospital

🇳🇴

Oslo, Norway

Hypertension Unit, Dpt of Hypertension and diabetology, Medical University of Gdansk

🇵🇱

Gdansk, Poland

Tallinn Hypertension Excellence Centre
🇪🇪Tallin, Estonia

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.