Characterising Pain, QoL, Body Composition, Arterial Stiffness, Muscles and Bones in Adult Persons With XLH and Healthy Controls
- Conditions
- Hereditary HypophosphatemiaX-linked Hypophosphatemia
- Registration Number
- NCT04273490
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Aarhus
- Brief Summary
Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in the phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X-chromosome (PHEX) results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults.
This study aims to characterize and measure pain, quality of life, muscle function, body composition, arterial stiffness, bone mineral density, geometry and microarchitecture in patients with XLH compared to age and gender-matched controls.
- Detailed Description
Hereditary hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare, inherited disease. Loss-of-function mutation in PHEX results in excess fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) production and manifests as rickets in children and osteomalacia in adults. FGF23 is a hormone that reduces renal phosphate reabsorption, decreases renal 1α-hydroxylase activity and increases renal 24-hydroxylase activity. As a consequence, individuals with XLH display hypophosphatemia and inadequate levels of 1,25(OH)2D (1). Therefore, conventional medical treatment of XLH aims to replace the loss with oral phosphate and activated vitamin D analogues.
The pain experienced by patients with hypophosphatemic rickets is not well characterized and needs to be addressed in order to establish the most optimal pain management in patients with XLH. The causes of pain experienced by patients with XLH are numerous: osteomalacia, enthesopathy, muscular pain, lower limb deformities, secondary arthrosis, nerve compression, and dental abscesses (3).
Quality of life (QoL) in patients with XLH is only briefly studied (4, 5). A French study found significantly decreased QoL among adult patients with XLH compared to patients with axial spondylarthritis. Especially enthesopathies were associated with a decreased QoL (4).
Increased blood levels of FGF23 are not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease in itself (6-8). However, conventional therapy for patients with XLH may increase their cardiovascular risk since complications to the therapy such as nephrocalcinosis and hyperparathyroidism are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness may be a valuable marker of increased cardiovascular risk as it has been able to predict cardiovascular disease and mortality in different populations (10, 11). If conventional therapy increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, arterial stiffness may be increased among patients with XLH which may depend on treatment status (i.e., currently treated, currently non-treated, accumulated (years of) treatment and treatment naïve).
Patients with XLH often complain about muscle fatigue and exhaustion. Muscle function in XLH is thought to be compromised by chronic hypophosphatemia, but the effect of XLH on muscle function has only been briefly evaluated (12, 13).
There are no available reports on body composition in XLH adults, but body mass index (BMI) in XLH is increased compared to controls (14).
In previous studies, examinations by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) have shown significantly larger total bone area in patients with XLH compared to individuals without XLH. However, patients with XLH have a reduced number of trabeculae and cortical thickness (15). These differences are seen regardless of treatment. When receiving conventional treatment, the cortical porosity is significantly elevated compared to patients with XLH who receive no treatment (17).
HYPOTHESES:
Primary null hypotheses:
* There is no difference in pressure pain threshold between groups.
* There is no difference in QoL between groups.
* There is no difference in arterial stiffness assessed by tonometry between groups.
* There is no difference in 24h blood pressure between groups.
* There is no difference in muscle strength and function between groups.
* There is no difference in body composition between groups.
* There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength between groups.
* There is no difference in presence of osteoid-volume, -surface or -thickness, osteoclast number, osteoblastic surface, osteoblast morphology or mineralization time between groups.
* Osteomalacia is not more common in bone biopsies from patients with XLH compared to controls.
Secondary null hypotheses:
* There is no difference in arterial stiffness within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
* There is no difference in 24h blood pressure within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
* There is no difference in bone mineral density, geometry, microarchitecture or estimated strength within the XLH group when stratifying for treatment status.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design:
A cross-sectional study of adult persons with XLH and an age- and gender-matched control group.
Population:
The investigators plan to include 50 persons with XLH and 50 control persons without disturbances in the calcium, vitamin D or phosphate homeostasis, matched by age (+/- 2 years) and gender. For women, matching will also be performed on menopausal status.
EXAMINATIONS
Questionnaires:
Pain will be assessed by a bone-specific questionnaire (FACT-BP), a questionnaire for general pain (Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)), and one for assessment of neuropathic pain (painDETECT).
The participant's level of catastrophic thinking will be assessed with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Depression and anxiety will be assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7).
Quality of Life will be measured by the SF-36 questionnaire (SF36v2).
Pressure algometry:
Mechanical pressure pain over the bone will be determined as force (N) per skin area (cm2) by a handhold pressure algometer with a 1 cm2 probe (Algometer II, Somedic SenseLab AB) (18). The 1 cm2 probe will be directed perpendicularly to the skin and pressure will be applied at a constant force increase rate until the participant identifies the pressure as pain and presses a button (pressure pain threshold (PPT)). PPT will be measured over the sternum and also corresponding to the tibia 5 cm below the patella. The skin between the thumb and the index finger of the non-dominant hand will be measured as a control site.
Biochemistry:
Blood samples will be collected in a fasting state. The investigators will measure ionized calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinine, parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D metabolites (such as 25OHD; 1,25(OH)2D; 24,25(OH)2D; 1,24,25(OH)3D), vitamin D binding protein, FGF23, sclerostin, Klotho, osteopontin, and bone turnover markers (such as CTX, P1NP, osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase), and relevant genes for hereditary hypophosphatemia (if not previously genetically verified).
24 hour urine will be collected for measurement of calcium, phosphate, magnesium, creatinin, sodium and potassium.
Blood pressure and arterial stiffness 24-hour blood pressure will be measured using Arteriograph24. Arterial stiffness and pulse wave analysis (PWA) will be assessed by tonometry using the SphygmoCor system (Xcel; AtCor Medical, Sydney, NSW, Australia). Participants treated with betablockers will be excluded from blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements.
Muscle function The investigators will assess upper and lower extremity strength by handgrip strength, elbow flexion and extension, and knee flexion and extension using the adjustable dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland). To assess physical function, the investigators will use the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, repeated chair rising, repeated weight lifting and 6-minutes' walk test (6 MWT).
Physical examination In order to quantify the degree of malformation of the joints in the lower extremities, the smallest distance between knees and between ankles will be measured in standing, weight bearing position.
Joint mobility The investigators will assess joint function in enthesopathy-suspected joints (neck/back, hip, knee and ankle) as well as shoulder, elbow, wrist and knee in order to discriminate between pain originating from osteomalacia or from enthesopathies.
Body composition and VFA using DXA Body composition and bone mineral density (Forearm, hip, lumbar spine and whole body) will be assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Discovery A scanner; Hologic, USA). Obtaining vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by DXA enables us to exclude reported back pain being due to vertebral compression fractures.
High-resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography:
A HRpQCT bone scan of the dominant distal tibia and radius will be performed using an Xtreme CT-scanner (SCANCO Medical AG, Switzerland).
Bone biopsies:
Optional bone biopsies will be taken after assessment of pain characteristics. Participation in the overall study is allowed without participating in this examination.
One 7 mm biopsy marked with tetracyclin 14, 13, 4, and 3 days prior will be fixed in ethanol and analysed by HRpQCT, Nano-scale and histomorphometry.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 92
- Understand oral and written Danish
- Able to consent
For XLH only:
- genetically verified XLH by detection of a disease-causing mutation in PHEX or a positive family history of X-linked hypophosphatemia.
- biochemically verified hereditary hypophosphatemia: serum PO4 below normal range and low TmPO4/GFR, and/or elevated serum FGF23 and a history of childhood rickets or spontaneous endodontic abscesses to exclude acquired hypophosphatemia, e.g., tumor-induced osteomalacia.
- P-25OHD < 25 mmol/L*
-
Severe co-morbidities, which in the opinion of the investigator may have major impact on study outcomes. This may include, but is not limited to o poorly controlled hyperthyroidism o Paget disease
o type 1 diabetes mellitus or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus
o severe and chronic cardiac, liver, or renal disease
o Cushing syndrome
o Rheumatoid arthritis
o Active pancreatitis
o Malnutrition
o Recent prolonged immobility*
o Active malignancy (including myeloma)
-
Treatment with
o Burosumab
- Beta-blockers
- Oral steroids
-
For controls only:
-
disturbances in the calcium or phosphate homeostasis
- participants with low 25OHD levels or recent immobility may be re-screened for participations 6 months after this has been corrected
-
-
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of life in patients with bone-specific pain Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (FACT-BP) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Maximal force production Day 2 Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).
Arterial stiffness 24 hours Assessed by tonometry using Arteriograph24
Repeated chair rising Day 2 Measures the time for ten consecutive chair rises.
Bone microarchitecture Day 1 Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy
General pain: Brief Pain Inventory Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (Brief Pain Inventory) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.
Timed Up and Go Day 2 Measures the time to stand up, walk three metres in a straight line, and immediately return to the chair.
Body composition Day 2 Assessed by DXA
Bone geometry Day 1 Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy
Osteoid surface covering 14 days Osteoid surface covering in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy
PPT Day 2 Pressure pain threshold assessed by pressure algometry
Neuropathic pain: questionnaire (painDETECT) Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (painDETECT) on a scale from 0 to 10. 0 meaning no pain, 10 meaning worst pain ever.
Health-related quality of life: SF36v2 Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (SF36v2) on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores meaning a worse outcome.
Vertebral Fracture Assessment Day 2 Assessed by DXA
Mineralization lag time 14 days Histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Osteoid thickness 14 days Osteoid thickness in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Percentage of surface covered by osteoblasts 14 days Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Lacunar concentration of mineralization inhibitors 14 days Assessed by nano-scale on bone biopsy
Pulse wave velocity 45 minutes Assessed by tonometry using SphygmoCor system
Maximum strength Day 2 Handgrip strength, elbow and knee flexion and extension assessed by dynamometer chair (Good Strength; Metitur Ltd, Finland).
6-minutes' walk test Day 1 Measures the distance walked in 6 minutes.
Volumetric bone mineral density Day 1 Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy
Mineralization rate 14 days Histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Osteoid volume 14 days Osteoid volume in trabecular and compact bone assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Estimated bone strength Day 1 Assessed by HRpQCT of distal tibia, distal radius, and bone biopsy
Percentage of surface covered by osteoclasts 14 days Assessed by histomorphometry on bone biopsy
Repeated weight lifting Day 2 Measures the time for ten consecutive weight lifts.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure 24 hours 24 hour blood pressure of the upper right arm
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anxiety Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Depression Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (Patient Health Questionnaire) on a scale from 0 to 3. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Catastrophic thinking Day 1 Assessed by questionnaire (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) on a scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dept. of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, The Osteoporosis Clinic
🇩🇰Aarhus N, Denmark