Effects of Spinal Manipulation in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Lumbar Pain Syndrome; Back Pain; Back Pain, Low
• Interventions: Other: Spinal manipulation + Kinesiotaping; Other: Spinal Manipulation + exercise program; Other: spinal manipulation + respiratory exercise

• Registration Number: NCT05080374
• Lead Sponsor: Ignacio Alejandro Astudillo Ganora

Brief Summary

Introduction: Nonspecific low back pain is the most common cause of visits to medical personnel and is the largest cause of absenteeism in the world. (1), Nonspecific low back pain accounts for 85% of low back pain, notably affecting quality of life and working life (2), There is a 50-70% probability that a person will have low back pain during their life ( 3), lumbago produces 300,000 years lived with disability (ADL), being the first burden of disease in Chile, surpassing hypertensive heart disease and depression (4). There are many therapeutic approaches to the management of nonspecific low back pain, including high-speed, low-amplitude spinal manipulations (5). This technique consists of applying a short and rapid force at the level of the joint that is restricted, in order to restore normal joint mobility. The physiological effects of manipulations are not sufficiently studied, but some authors (6) (7) suggest that the nervous system is the mediator of the effects of spinal manipulation. Among non-pharmacological interventions, numerous clinical guidelines recommend the use of therapeutic exercise for low back pain (8), including a wide variety of types of recommended exercises, the most traditionally recommended being aerobic exercises, exercises that involve stretching postures of the back. vertebral musculature, strengthening and strength exercises (9) and central stabilization exercises (10). Recently, the effects of inspiratory muscle and diaphragm training exercises in patients with low back pain are being investigated (11). The application of an elastic bandage (12) in the lumbar area generates a proprioceptive signal through the skin, producing analgesia and a feeling of support in the area.

Objectives: To compare the effects of different therapeutic approaches in combination with spinal manipulation.

Design and method: Single-blind randomized clinical trial Results: Significant differences are expected before and after treatment and differences between groups.

Conclusion: The aims of this study is to demonstrate that High speed and low amplitude spinal manipulation plus other conservative treatment is a valid therapeutic strategy for the management of nonspecific low back pain

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-08-11
• Primary Completion: 2021-09-11
• Study Completion: 2021-09-11
• Study First Submitted: 2021-09-23
• Status Verified: 2021-10
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-10-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-10-04
• Study First Posted: 2021-10-15
• Last Update Posted: 2021-10-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 90

Inclusion Criteria

• older than 18 years
• with nonspecific low back pain

Exclusion Criteria

• chronic low back pain (more than 3 months)
• spinal surgeries
• red flags for spinal manipulation (osteoporosis, bone metastasis, etc)

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
HVLA + kinesiotaping group	Spinal manipulation + Kinesiotaping	Spinal manipulation (HVLA) + Kinesiotaping (lumbar)
HVLA + exercise Group	Spinal Manipulation + exercise program	Spinal manipulation (HVLA) + trunk exercise program
HVLA + Respiratory exercise group	spinal manipulation + respiratory exercise	Spinal manipulation (HVLA) + respiratory exercise program

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Biomechanical changes (shober test)	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe the changes in the biomechanics of the spine through the Shober test (Schöber test. It is performed with the patient standing and the examiner on his back. A point is indicated that locates L5 (at the height of the dimples of Venus or the iliac crests are used, which correspond to L4, and is marked 1cm below) and a second point is marked 10cm above.)
Biomechanical changes (lateral tilt test)	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe the changes in the biomechanics of the spine through the lateral tilt test (centimeters from the tip of the middle finger to the ground)
changes in function	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe changes in disability due to nonspecific low back pain through the Oswestry test (The Oswestry Test comprises 10 items, of 10 points each, with a maximum of 100, this score being the worst possible functional state.)
changes in pain EVA	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe changes in pain through visual analogue scale (VAS) 0 to 10
Changes in pain pressure algometers	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe changes in pain in painful points through a pressure monitor (painmeter) (0 to 10 kilograms 0 to 22 pounds)
biomechanical changes (finger-floor test)	baseline after 6 weeks and a month	observe the changes in the biomechanics of the spine through the finger-floor test (centimeters from the tip of the middle finger to the ground)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Physiotherapy deparment, Murcia University; 🇪🇸 Murcia, Spain